{"id":8898,"date":"2026-09-30T04:28:41","date_gmt":"2026-09-30T04:28:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ashadocs.org\/scales\/classroom-climate-questionnaire\/"},"modified":"2026-09-30T04:28:41","modified_gmt":"2026-09-30T04:28:41","slug":"classroom-climate-questionnaire","status":"publish","type":"psych_scale","link":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/?psych_scale=classroom-climate-questionnaire","title":{"rendered":"Classroom Climate Questionnaire"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Abstract<\/h2>\n<p>The <strong>Classroom Climate Questionnaire<\/strong> (German: <em>Fragebogen zum Unterrichtsklima<\/em>, often abbreviated as CCQ) is a teacher-report psychometric instrument designed to evaluate classroom learning environment dynamics, socio-emotional relational structures, and disciplinary patterns in primary and secondary schools. Developed within the empirical research framework of <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Educational_psychology\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">educational psychology<\/a> by Hans-Dietrich Dann and colleagues at the University of Konstanz, the instrument operationalizes teachers&#8217; subjective theories regarding social interactions and behavioral disruptions during instructional periods. The questionnaire comprises 46 items distributed across five primary subscales: (1) <em>Social Relations between Students<\/em> (14 items), measuring mutual assistance, empathy, integration, and the absence of peer hostility; (2) <em>Aggression Against the Teacher<\/em> (12 items), assessing overt hostility, provocations, and defiance targeted at instructors; (3) <em>Cooperation with the Teacher<\/em> (7 items), indexing active pedagogical engagement, rapport, and mutual trust; (4) <em>Disciplinary Violations<\/em> (8 items), evaluating classroom disruption, restlessness, and challenges to normative order; and (5) <em>Emotionality<\/em> (5 items), capturing affective expressiveness, humor, enthusiasm, and openness within the learning group.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\">Items are rated on a four-point categorical rating format ranging from 1 (<em>v\u00f6llig falsch<\/em> \/ completely untrue) to 4 (<em>v\u00f6llig richtig<\/em> \/ completely true), with balanced positive and negative keying across dimensions to mitigate response styles. Psychometric evaluations conducted on a pretest sample (<em>N<\/em> = 400) and a representative field sample (<em>N<\/em> = 1,176) of primary and secondary school educators (<em>Grund- und Hauptschullehrer<\/em>) in Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg, Germany, demonstrated high internal consistency across subscales. Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) and equivalent internal consistency estimates yielded values of .94 for Social Relations between Students, .87 for Aggression Against the Teacher, .90 for Cooperation with the Teacher, .94 for Disciplinary Violations, and .69 for Emotionality. Inter-scale correlation matrices, item discrimination coefficients (averaging .30 to .86), and theoretical alignment with subjective theory paradigms confirm the instrument&#8217;s structural utility for classroom research, school climate evaluations, and teacher stress interventions<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h2>Keywords<\/h2>\n<p>Classroom Climate Questionnaire, Unterrichtsklima, classroom learning environment, subjective theories, teacher perceptions, classroom management, peer social relations, student aggression, student-teacher cooperation, disciplinary violations, emotionality, school psychology<\/p>\n<h2>Authors<\/h2>\n<p>The Classroom Climate Questionnaire was developed by an interdisciplinary research team focusing on school aggression, teacher cognition, and interactive classroom dynamics based at the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/University_of_Konstanz\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">University of Konstanz<\/a> (Universit\u00e4t Konstanz), Germany:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Prof. em. Dr. Hans-Dietrich Dann<\/strong> &ndash; Department of Psychology \/ Educational Science, University of Konstanz, Germany. Principal investigator on teacher subjective theories and classroom aggression (E-mail contact: <a href=\"mailto:hd.dann@nefcom.net\">hd.dann@nefcom.net<\/a>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Dr. Winfried Humpert<\/strong> &ndash; Educational researcher and psychologist, collaborator on the research project <em>Aggression in der Schule<\/em>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Dr. Frank Krause<\/strong> &ndash; Co-investigator on teacher cognition, interactive instructional action, and behavioral assessment.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Dr. Ewald Obrich<\/strong> &ndash; Co-investigator and psychometric analyst for classroom interaction studies.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Dr. Klaus-Christoph Tennst\u00e4dt<\/strong> &ndash; Clinical and educational psychologist, specialized in teacher training and classroom coping strategies.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Purpose<\/h2>\n<p>The primary purpose of the Classroom Climate Questionnaire is to provide an empirically grounded, multidimensional diagnosis of the instructional climate from the direct subjective viewpoint of the classroom teacher. Within the traditions of educational assessment, learning environments have frequently been evaluated either through direct observational protocols or through student self-report surveys. While student perceptions are critical for understanding subjective well-being, the teacher&#8217;s cognitive appraisal of the classroom milieu represents an equally determinative psychological reality that guides pedagogical decisions, instructional tempo, coping behaviors, and disciplinary practices.<\/p>\n<h3>Measurement Objectives<\/h3>\n<p>The CCQ is specifically designed to quantify five interconnected dimensions of classroom life: the quality of peer-to-peer solidarity and conflict, direct interpersonal antagonism aimed at pedagogical authority, academic and personal collaboration between students and educator, systemic rule compliance versus instructional interference, and the general affective climate. By capturing these specific domains, the scale addresses the underlying psychological variables that sustain academic engagement or, conversely, exacerbate occupational stress and burnout among educators.<\/p>\n<h3>Theoretical and Practical Rationale<\/h3>\n<p>The development of the CCQ arose out of the landmark German research project <em>Aggression in der Schule<\/em> (Dann et al., 1982), which explored how teachers construct internal cognitive models &mdash; termed <em>subjective theories<\/em> (Groeben, 1986; Dann, 1983) &mdash; to interpret classroom events. In volatile classroom environments, instructional acts occur rapidly, requiring real-time, automatic appraisals. The CCQ provides researchers and practitioners with an index of these structural schemas. Teachers who conceptualize their class as fundamentally uncooperative, aggressive, or prone to chronic disciplinary breakdown exhibit markedly different emotional strain and behavioral responses than those who perceive their students as cohesive, emotionally expressive, and cooperative.<\/p>\n<h3>Applications in Research and Educational Practice<\/h3>\n<p>The scale serves diverse applications across educational, psychological, and institutional settings:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>School Psychology and Consultation:<\/strong> School psychologists utilize the CCQ to assess baseline relational health in classrooms exhibiting chronic behavioral issues, facilitating targeted classroom management consultations.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Teacher Burnout and Mental Health Research:<\/strong> Because chronic disciplinary disruption and student hostility are leading predictors of occupational exhaustion (<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Burnout_(psychology)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">burnout syndrome<\/a>), the scale allows researchers to isolate which specific classroom climate profiles represent the highest occupational health risks.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Intervention Evaluation:<\/strong> The instrument can be administered in pre-post designs to evaluate school-wide positive behavioral support programs, anti-bullying curricula, or teacher professional development workshops in conflict de-escalation.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Comparative Climate Analysis:<\/strong> Educational administrators and researchers employ the CCQ to contrast climate profiles across school tracks (e.g., German <em>Grundschule<\/em>, <em>Hauptschule<\/em>, <em>Realschule<\/em>, and <em>Gymnasium<\/em>), tracking how structural school features shape social dynamics.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Psychological Construct<\/h2>\n<p>The construct measured by the instrument is <strong>Instructional Classroom Climate<\/strong> (<em>Unterrichtsklima<\/em>), defined as the relatively enduring perceptual quality of the classroom social and learning environment, experienced and interpreted through the teacher&#8217;s professional cognition. Rather than treating the classroom as an amorphous entity, the construct is conceptualized as an ecology of peer relations, teacher-pupil authority dynamics, task engagement, and affective tone. The instrument comprises five explicit dimensions:<\/p>\n<h3>1. Social Relations between Students (Sozialbeziehungen der Sch\u00fcler untereinander)<\/h3>\n<p>This 14-item subscale operationalizes the horizontal social architecture of the peer group. It examines the extent to which pupils demonstrate prosocial behavior, solidarity, mutual consideration, empathy toward academically struggling classmates, and integration of marginalized peers. Concurrently, it captures the presence of destructive peer processes, including malicious joy (<em>Schadenfreude<\/em>), social ridicule, ostracism, peer intimidation, physical altercations, and pervasive envy. A high score on this scale signifies an inclusive, supportive peer community where prosocial norms suppress peer victimization.<\/p>\n<h3>2. Aggression Against the Teacher (Aggression gegen den Lehrer)<\/h3>\n<p>Comprising 12 items, this dimension measures the vertical conflict vector directed toward the teacher&#8217;s personal and professional authority. It reflects overt hostilities, verbal insults, malicious intent, intentional attempts to humiliate or embarrass the teacher (<em>den Lehrer blo\u00dfstellen<\/em>), active provocations, and implicit or explicit threats of physical intimidation. In contrast to general classroom disruption, this subscale captures targeted, personalized relational aggression that directly destabilizes the educator&#8217;s psychological safety and sense of professional efficacy.<\/p>\n<h3>3. Cooperation with the Teacher (Kooperation mit dem Lehrer)<\/h3>\n<p>This 7-item subscale captures the positive collaborative bond connecting students and the instructor. It assesses voluntary participation, academic curiosity, active classroom contribution, and the warmth and approachability of interpersonal communication. High scores reflect an environment characterized by mutual respect, where pupils willingly align with pedagogical goals, engage warmly in dialogue, and foster a cordial teacher-student relationship (<em>herzliches Lehrer-Sch\u00fcler-Verh\u00e4ltnis<\/em>).<\/p>\n<h3>4. Disciplinary Violations (Disziplinarverst\u00f6\u00dfe)<\/h3>\n<p>Consisting of 8 items, this subscale measures the operational friction and structural disorder present during instructional time. It evaluates restlessness, general inattentiveness, mischief, failure to heed teacher directives without repeated prompting, and pervasive disruptions that halt pedagogical momentum. Unlike targeted aggression, disciplinary violations represent regulatory deficits, executive control failures, or low normative compliance that compel the instructor to spend excessive time maintaining basic order.<\/p>\n<h3>5. Emotionality (Emotionalit\u00e4t)<\/h3>\n<p>The 5-item Emotionality subscale indexes the expressive, affective atmosphere of the classroom group. It measures the degree to which students display spontaneous positive emotions, humor, enthusiasm for learning tasks, open expression of opinions, and uninhibited affective involvement. Rather than indexing behavioral chaos, healthy emotionality reflects vitality, psychological safety, and collective affective responsiveness.<\/p>\n<h2>Theoretical Framework<\/h2>\n<p>The conceptual foundation of the Classroom Climate Questionnaire is anchored in the convergence of two major psychological frameworks: the <strong>Research Program on Subjective Theories<\/strong> (<em>Forschungsprogramm Subjektive Theorien<\/em>; Dann, 1983; Groeben, 1986) and <strong>Social-Ecological Classroom Climate Theory<\/strong> (Moos, 1979; Fend, 1977).<\/p>\n<h3>Subjective Theories Paradigm<\/h3>\n<p>Pioneered by German cognitive and educational psychologists in the late 1970s and 1980s, the subjective theories paradigm posits that teachers, like scientists, hold complex, quasi-theoretical cognitive frameworks consisting of assumptions, causal attributions, and prescriptive rules regarding human behavior. These subjective theories operate as mental schemas through which teachers filter ambiguous classroom stimuli, interpret student motives, and generate behavioral decisions under conditions of rapid interaction.<\/p>\n<p>In instructional settings, a single student behavior &mdash; such as calling out an answer &mdash; can be appraised as enthusiastic engagement or as an insolent rule violation. The CCQ measures the structural contents of these subjective assessments. Dann et al. (1982) demonstrated that a teacher&#8217;s subjective theory of their classroom climate directly moderates their behavioral interventions during conflict episodes. When teachers conceptualize classroom climate as hostile and uncooperative, they deploy rigid, authoritarian, or defensive control tactics, which in turn foster reactive antagonism among students, producing a self-fulfilling cycle of escalating disruption.<\/p>\n<h3>Social-Ecological Learning Environment Framework<\/h3>\n<p>The five dimensions of the CCQ also align with <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Rudolf_Moos\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Rudolf Moos&#8217;<\/a> taxonomy of human environments, which delineates three fundamental ecological categories:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Relationship Dimensions:<\/strong> Reflected in the CCQ&#8217;s <em>Social Relations between Students<\/em>, <em>Cooperation with the Teacher<\/em>, and <em>Emotionality<\/em> subscales, which evaluate the depth, quality, and mutual supportiveness of interpersonal connections.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Personal Growth \/ Goal Orientation Dimensions:<\/strong> Addressed partially through <em>Cooperation with the Teacher<\/em>, indexing task engagement and academic involvement.<\/li>\n<li><strong>System Maintenance and Change Dimensions:<\/strong> Direct operationalization through <em>Disciplinary Violations<\/em> and <em>Aggression Against the Teacher<\/em>, which gauge the degree of order, behavioral regulation, rule conformity, and institutional control within the system.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>By translating these macro-sociological and ecological categories into concrete, everyday pedagogical events, the CCQ operationalizes classroom climate as an interactive construct situated between institutional structural constraints and individual psychological appraisal.<\/p>\n<h2>Validity<\/h2>\n<p>The construct, convergent, and criterion-related validity of the Classroom Climate Questionnaire was established during its original standardization across educational jurisdictions in Germany, primarily within the state of Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg (Dann et al., 1982).<\/p>\n<h3>Structural and Convergent Validity Patterns<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\">Because classroom climate dimensions represent interrelated facets of a unified learning ecology, construct validity was examined through inter-scale correlation matrices among the five subscales on a sample of <em>N<\/em> = 400 educators. The pattern and direction of these correlations strongly confirmed theoretical predictions<\/span>:<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:center; margin:16px 0;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f2f4f7; border-bottom:2px solid #ccc;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px; text-align:left;\">Subscale<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">SS<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">AL<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">KL<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">DL<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">EM<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e0e0e0;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\"><strong>Social Relations (SS)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">&mdash;<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.49<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.75<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.79<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.49<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e0e0e0;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\"><strong>Aggression vs. Teacher (AL)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.49<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">&mdash;<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.44<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.49<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.57<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e0e0e0;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\"><strong>Cooperation with Teacher (KL)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.75<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.44<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">&mdash;<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.73<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.59<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e0e0e0;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\"><strong>Disciplinary Violations (DL)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.79<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.49<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.73<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">&mdash;<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.50<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\"><strong>Emotionality (EM)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.49<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.57<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.59<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">-.50<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">&mdash;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>These empirical intercorrelations supply compelling construct validity evidence:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Peer Relations and Cooperation:<\/strong> <em>Social Relations between Students<\/em> correlates strongly and positively with <em>Cooperation with the Teacher<\/em> (<em>r<\/em> = .75), demonstrating that classrooms fostering healthy horizontal peer bonds also demonstrate vertical cooperative engagement with the pedagogue<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Discipline and Relational Functioning:<\/strong> <em>Disciplinary Violations<\/em> correlates substantially and inversely with both <em>Social Relations<\/em> (<em>r<\/em> = -.79) and <em>Cooperation with the Teacher<\/em> (<em>r<\/em> = -.73), showing that structural disorder is intimately tied to relational deficits<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Teacher Aggression Discriminability:<\/strong> <em>Aggression Against the Teacher<\/em> exhibits moderate positive correlation with general disciplinary disruption (<em>r<\/em> = .49) and negative correlations with cooperation (<em>r<\/em> = -.44) and peer relations (<em>r<\/em> = -.49). This demonstrates that while targeted teacher aggression co-occurs with general disorder, it represents a distinct pathological phenomenon that does not simply duplicate basic classroom restlessness<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Affective Dimensions:<\/strong> <em>Emotionality<\/em> correlates positively with cooperation (<em>r<\/em> = .59) and peer solidarity (<em>r<\/em> = .49), while negatively correlating with teacher aggression (<em>r<\/em> = -.57), supporting the conceptual premise that student emotional expressiveness reflects psychological comfort rather than unregulated hostility<\/span>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Criterion-Related and Practical Validity<\/h3>\n<p>In follow-up behavioral observation studies conducted within the <em>Aggression in der Schule<\/em> research project, teachers who recorded elevated scores on <em>Aggression Against the Teacher<\/em> and <em>Disciplinary Violations<\/em> demonstrated significantly higher frequencies of verbal sanctioning, escalating threats, and feelings of helplessness during acute classroom conflict situations. Conversely, high scores on <em>Cooperation with the Teacher<\/em> and <em>Social Relations<\/em> were predictive of pedagogical calmness, low physiological arousal, and successful instructional continuity.<\/p>\n<h2>Reliability<\/h2>\n<p><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\">The internal consistency of the Classroom Climate Questionnaire was evaluated on large empirical cohorts of educators in Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg. Reliability coefficients were computed using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) \/ Cronbach&#8217;s alpha framework across both the pretest (<em>N<\/em> = 400) and the primary validation cohort (<em>N<\/em> = 1,176)<\/span>.<\/p>\n<h3>Internal Consistency Estimates<\/h3>\n<p>Four of the five subscales achieve excellent psychometric reliability benchmarks, surpassing standards for research and individual diagnostic screening:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Social Relations between Students:<\/strong> KR-20 = <strong>.94<\/strong> (Average Item-Total Correlation <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .71). The subscale demonstrates remarkable internal coherence across its 14 items, with item-total correlations ranging from .60 to .84<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Aggression Against the Teacher:<\/strong> KR-20 = <strong>.87<\/strong> (Average Item-Total Correlation <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .58). Across 12 items, discrimination indices range from .33 to .78, reliably capturing subtle and overt hostility<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Cooperation with the Teacher:<\/strong> KR-20 = <strong>.90<\/strong> (Average Item-Total Correlation <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .71). Across 7 items, item-total correlations remain exceptionally robust, spanning .66 to .76<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Disciplinary Violations:<\/strong> KR-20 = <strong>.94<\/strong> (Average Item-Total Correlation <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .79). The 8 items exhibit extraordinary discriminative power, ranging from .70 to .86<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Emotionality:<\/strong> KR-20 = <strong>.69<\/strong> (Average Item-Total Correlation <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .45). Consisting of only 5 items, this scale possesses moderate internal consistency. Item discrimination coefficients range from .30 to .55. This lower coefficient reflects the multidimensional nature of classroom emotionality, which spans both energetic mirth and uninhibited emotional outbursts<\/span>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Normative Descriptive Statistics<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\">Subscale means (<em>M<\/em>) and standard deviations (<em>s<\/em>) documented in the standardization sample (<em>N<\/em> = 1,176) provide normative reference parameters for educational researchers<\/span>:<\/p>\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:center; margin:16px 0;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f2f4f7; border-bottom:2px solid #ccc;\">\n<th style=\"padding:10px; text-align:left;\">Subscale<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">Item Count<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">Mean (<em>M<\/em>)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">Standard Deviation (<em>s<\/em>)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding:10px;\">Reliability (KR-20)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e0e0e0;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\">Social Relations between Students<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">14<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">38.15<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">7.91<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.94<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e0e0e0;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\">Aggression Against the Teacher<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">12<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">19.27<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">5.92<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.87<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e0e0e0;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\">Cooperation with the Teacher<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">7<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">19.19<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">4.37<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.90<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #e0e0e0;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\">Disciplinary Violations<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">8<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">17.57<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">5.89<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.94<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:left;\">Emotionality<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">5<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">14.52<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">2.58<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">.69<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>Factor Analysis<\/h2>\n<p>During scale construction, item selection was theoretically driven by structural dimensions of classroom interaction documented by Fend (1977), Humpert and Hummer (1980), and Dann et al. (1982). Each of the five subscales was designed to represent a unidimensional behavioral spectrum within teacher perception.<\/p>\n<h3>Item Discrimination and Homogeneity<\/h3>\n<p>While strict formal confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) modeling was not routine practice at the time of the instrument&#8217;s development in 1982, scale homogeneity was evaluated using average item-total correlations and corrected item discrimination coefficients (<em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub>). As established in psychometric theory, high item-total correlation across a multi-item inventory serves as a direct indicator of essential unidimensionality.<\/p>\n<p>Item analyses revealed robust factor homogeneity across the operational dimensions:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Social Relations:<\/strong> The 14 items exhibit an average item-total correlation of .71. High loading items include Item 8 (<em>&#8220;Wie die Sch\u00fcler in dieser Klasse pers\u00f6nlich miteinander umgehen, ist eigentlich recht erfreulich&#8221;<\/em>; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .84) and Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 13 (all <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> &ge; .74). These loadings confirm a primary factor capturing general prosocial versus antisocial peer orientation<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Aggression Against the Teacher:<\/strong> Average homogeneity coefficient was .58. Items directly capturing overt hostility &mdash; such as Item 26 (<em>&#8220;Diese Klasse ist relativ aggressiv gegen\u00fcber dem Lehrer&#8221;<\/em>; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .78) and Item 21 (<em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .69) &mdash; show strong loadings, while items tapping rare, extreme physical danger (Item 18; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .40) or subtle trickery (Item 17; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .33) exhibit lower discrimination due to strong floor effects in general educational samples<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Cooperation with the Teacher:<\/strong> Average item-total correlation was .71. Items indexing active instructional collaboration (Item 31; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .76) and ease of personal contact (Item 32; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .74) align into a single cohesive collaborative factor<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Disciplinary Violations:<\/strong> With an average homogeneity index of .79, this scale demonstrates the highest structural cohesion. Items capturing acute disciplinary difficulty (Item 38; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .86), chronic friction over order (Item 37; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .83), and instructional disturbance (Item 41; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .83) display nearly interchangeable loadings on a single disruptive factor<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Emotionality:<\/strong> Average homogeneity was .45. Factorial complexity is elevated here; cheerfulness (Item 42; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .55) and joy over small things (Item 46; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .53) load somewhat distinctly from candor of opinions (Item 44; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .30) and emotional outbursts (Item 45; <em>r<\/em><sub>it<\/sub> = .32)<\/span>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Instrument \/ Measurement Tool<\/h2>\n<p>The operational characteristics and structural layout of the Classroom Climate Questionnaire are structured as follows:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Test Type:<\/strong> Teacher-report psychometric rating scale \/ standardized educational questionnaire.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Respondent Target:<\/strong> Primary and secondary school educators (specifically class teachers or subject teachers with extensive instructional hours in the target classroom).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Total Item Count:<\/strong> 46 items.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Subscale Breakdown:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Social Relations between Students:<\/em> 14 items (Items 1 to 14)<\/li>\n<li><em>Aggression Against the Teacher:<\/em> 12 items (Items 15 to 26)<\/li>\n<li><em>Cooperation with the Teacher:<\/em> 7 items (Items 27 to 33)<\/li>\n<li><em>Disciplinary Violations:<\/em> 8 items (Items 34 to 41)<\/li>\n<li><em>Emotionality:<\/em> 5 items (Items 42 to 46)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Authentic Response Scale:<\/strong> 4-stufige Kategorial-Skalen mit den Verbalisierungen: <span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\">1 = v\u00f6llig falsch, 2 = eher falsch, 3 = eher richtig, 4 = v\u00f6llig richtig (4-point categorical scale: 1 = completely untrue, 2 = rather untrue, 3 = rather true, 4 = completely true)<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Administration Format:<\/strong> Self-administered paper-and-pencil questionnaire or digitized computer-based assessment; completed individually or in collective research settings.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Completion Time:<\/strong> Approximately 10 to 15 minutes.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Scoring and Polarity Rules:<\/strong>\n<ul>\n<li>Each of the five subscales is scored by summing the numerical ratings of its constituent items after reverse-scoring.<\/li>\n<li><span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\"><strong>Polarity (+) Items:<\/strong> Retain original values (1 = 1, 2 = 2, 3 = 3, 4 = 4)<\/span>.\n<ul>\n<li><em>Social Relations:<\/em> Items 1, 3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14<\/li>\n<li><em>Aggression vs. Teacher:<\/em> Items 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26<\/li>\n<li><em>Cooperation:<\/em> Items 28, 29, 31, 32, 33<\/li>\n<li><em>Disciplinary Violations:<\/em> Items 34, 36, 37, 38, 41<\/li>\n<li><em>Emotionality:<\/em> Items 42, 44, 46<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Polarity (&minus;) Items:<\/strong> Must be reversed prior to summation (1 &rarr; 4, 2 &rarr; 3, 3 &rarr; 2, 4 &rarr; 1).\n<ul>\n<li><em>Social Relations:<\/em> Items 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, 13<\/li>\n<li><em>Aggression vs. Teacher:<\/em> Items 15, 16, 19, 23, 25<\/li>\n<li><em>Cooperation:<\/em> Items 27, 30<\/li>\n<li><em>Disciplinary Violations:<\/em> Items 35, 39, 40<\/li>\n<li><em>Emotionality:<\/em> Items 43, 45<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><strong>Interpretation:<\/strong> Higher aggregate sum scores reflect greater manifest presence of the respective construct (i.e., higher prosocial cohesion, elevated hostility toward the educator, stronger pedagogical cooperation, more frequent disciplinary breakdown, or heightened affective expressiveness).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Permissions &amp; Fee and Test Year<\/h2>\n<p>The Classroom Climate Questionnaire was formally established and published in <strong>1982<\/strong> within the research monograph reporting findings from the <em>Aggression in der Schule<\/em> project at the University of Konstanz (Dann et al., 1982). As an academic research instrument developed under public research funding, the scale was created for non-commercial scientific inquiry, diagnostic evaluation, and educational improvement.<\/p>\n<p>Researchers and educational practitioners wishing to utilize the instrument in empirical studies, school evaluations, or university dissertations are typically granted academic fair-use permissions. For formal diagnostic adaptation, institutional reproduction, or translation into languages other than German, correspondence may be directed to the primary author:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Contact:<\/strong> Prof. em. Dr. Hans-Dietrich Dann, Department of Psychology \/ Educational Science, University of Konstanz. (E-mail: <a href=\"mailto:hd.dann@nefcom.net\">hd.dann@nefcom.net<\/a>).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Licensing and Fees:<\/strong> Non-commercial scientific research use is generally free of fee. Commercial distribution or integration into proprietary diagnostic software systems requires explicit authorization from the copyright holders.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Dann, H.-D. (1983). <em>Subjektive Theorien: Konzeption und psychologische Bedeutung f\u00fcr das Lehrerhandeln<\/em> [Subjective theories: Conception and psychological significance for teacher action]. In L. Montada, K. Reusser, &amp; G. Steiner (Eds.), <em>Kognition und Handeln<\/em> (pp. 79&ndash;92). Klett-Cotta.<\/li>\n<li>Dann, H.-D., Humpert, W., Krause, F., Obrich, E., &amp; Tennst\u00e4dt, K.-C. (1982). <em>Aggression im schulischen Alltag: Erleben und Verhalten von Hauptschullehrern in aggressiven Unterrichtssituationen<\/em> [Aggression in everyday school life: Experience and behavior of secondary modern school teachers in aggressive instructional situations]. University of Konstanz.<\/li>\n<li>Fend, H. (1977). <em>Schulklima: Soziale Einflussprozesse in der Schule<\/em> [School climate: Social influence processes in the school]. Beltz.<\/li>\n<li>Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. <em>Learning Environments Research<\/em>, 1(1), 7&ndash;33. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1009932514731\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1009932514731<\/a><\/li>\n<li>Groeben, N. (1986). <em>Handeln, Tun, Verhalten als Einheiten einer verstehend-erkl\u00e4renden Psychologie<\/em> [Action, deed, behavior as units of an understanding-explanatory psychology]. Francke.<\/li>\n<li>Humpert, W., &amp; Hummer, P. (1980). <em>Unterrichtsklima aus Lehrersicht: Dimensionen und Erfassung<\/em> [Instructional climate from the teacher&#8217;s perspective: Dimensions and assessment]. Universit\u00e4t Konstanz, Forschungsbericht des Projekts Aggression in der Schule.<\/li>\n<li>Moos, R. H. (1979). <em>Evaluating Educational Environments: Procedures, Measures, Findings and Policy Implications<\/em>. Jossey-Bass.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Items of the Scale<\/h2>\n<div class=\"wpt-scale-items-container\" style=\"direction:ltr; text-align:left; font-family:sans-serif;\">\n<p><strong>Instruktion:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Wir bitten Sie, uns einige Fragen in Bezug auf die Klasse zu beantworten, in der Sie gerade Klassenlehrer sind. Falls Sie keine eigene Klasse haben, geben Sie Ihre Beurteilung bitte f\u00fcr diejenige Klasse ab, in der Sie am meisten unterrichten. Wir haben diesen m\u00f6glichst konkreten Bezug gew\u00e4hlt, da Sie hier den gr\u00f6\u00dften Einblick haben und sich auch an allt\u00e4gliche Ereignisse sicher am besten erinnern k\u00f6nnen. Uns interessiert speziell, wie Sie die Zusammenarbeit, die Kooperation und die Aggressivit\u00e4t gerade dieser Klasse, die Sie jetzt unterrichten, beurteilen. Bitte denken Sie bei der Beantwortung der Fragen immer daran, dass es hier nur um diese Klasse und um Ihre pers\u00f6nlichen Erfahrungen mit dieser Klasse geht. Kreuzen Sie auch hier jeweils eine der vier Antwortm\u00f6glichkeiten an.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Antwortvorgaben:<\/strong><br \/>\n  4-stufige Kategorial-Skalen mit den Verbalisierungen: <span class=\"arabpsy-eq\" dir=\"ltr\">1 = v\u00f6llig falsch, 2 = eher falsch, 3 = eher richtig, 4 = v\u00f6llig richtig<\/span><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"margin-top:24px; border-bottom:1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom:6px;\">Skala 1: Sozialbeziehungen der Sch\u00fcler untereinander<\/h3>\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin-bottom:24px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8f9fa; border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;\">\n<th style=\"width:8%; padding:8px;\">Nr.<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:82%; padding:8px;\">Item<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:10%; padding:8px; text-align:center;\">Polung<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">1<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die meisten Sch\u00fcler dieser Klasse sind untereinander sehr hilfsbereit.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">2<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die mangelnde Hilfsbereitschaft der Sch\u00fcler untereinander ist in dieser Klasse erschreckend.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">3<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Gerade in dieser Klasse habe ich den Eindruck, dass Grobheiten unter Sch\u00fclern vergleichsweise selten vorkommen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">4<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Kameradschaftliches Verhalten kann man in dieser Klasse im Vergleich zu anderen nur selten beobachten.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">5<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Wenn in dieser Klasse ein Sch\u00fcler einem Mitsch\u00fcler einen Schaden zuf\u00fcgt, so herrscht auff\u00e4llig viel Schadenfreude.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">6<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse haben es Au\u00dfenseiter besonders schwer, sich zu integrieren.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">7<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Aggressionen zwischen Sch\u00fclern werden besonders in dieser Klasse von den Mitsch\u00fclern nicht geduldet.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">8<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Wie die Sch\u00fcler in dieser Klasse pers\u00f6nlich miteinander umgehen, ist eigentlich recht erfreulich.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">9<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Das Verspotten von Mitsch\u00fclern ist in dieser Klasse \u00e4u\u00dferst beliebt.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">10<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Diese Klasse nimmt auf schw\u00e4chere und schlechtere Sch\u00fcler besondere R\u00fccksicht.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">11<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die meisten Sch\u00fcler in dieser Klasse respektieren die Rechte ihrer Mitsch\u00fcler.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">12<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse ist nur jeder auf seinen eigenen Vorteil bedacht.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">13<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Neid und Missgunst sind in dieser Klasse stark verbreitet.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">14<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Pr\u00fcgeleien unter Sch\u00fclern sind in dieser Klasse im Vergleich zu anderen die Ausnahme<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 style=\"margin-top:24px; border-bottom:1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom:6px;\">Skala 2: Aggression gegen den Lehrer<\/h3>\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin-bottom:24px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8f9fa; border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;\">\n<th style=\"width:8%; padding:8px;\">Nr.<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:82%; padding:8px;\">Item<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:10%; padding:8px; text-align:center;\">Polung<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">15<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">B\u00f6swilligkeiten von Sch\u00fclern gegen\u00fcber dem Lehrer kommen in dieser Klasse eher selten vor.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">16<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Pers\u00f6nliche Beleidigungen des Lehrers sind in dieser Klasse recht selten.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">17<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse kommt es gelegentlich vor, dass die Sch\u00fcler versuchen, mich reinzulegen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">18<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Dies ist eine Klasse, in der es evtl. vorkommen k\u00f6nnte, dass ein Sch\u00fcler auch einmal k\u00f6rperlich gewaltt\u00e4tig gegen\u00fcber dem Lehrer wird.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">19<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse kommt es relativ selten vor, dass ich von den Sch\u00fclern beschimpft werde.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">20<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Feindseligkeiten gegen\u00fcber dem Lehrer treten in dieser Klasse eher h\u00e4ufiger als sonst auf.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">21<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse ist die Atmosph\u00e4re mir gegen\u00fcber oft ausgesprochen aggressiv.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">22<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Es gibt ein paar Sch\u00fcler in dieser Klasse, die Spa\u00df daran haben, den Lehrer blo\u00dfzustellen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">23<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Ich kann mir kaum vorstellen, dass diese Klasse auf die Idee k\u00e4me, den Lehrer &#8220;fertigzumachen&#8221;.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">24<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Provokationen der Sch\u00fcler mir gegen\u00fcber sind in dieser Klasse relativ h\u00e4ufiger als in anderen Klassen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">25<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse gibt es nur sehr wenig Aggressivit\u00e4t von Sch\u00fclern gegen\u00fcber dem Lehrer.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">26<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Diese Klasse ist relativ aggressiv gegen\u00fcber dem Lehrer.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 style=\"margin-top:24px; border-bottom:1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom:6px;\">Skala 3: Kooperation mit dem Lehrer<\/h3>\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin-bottom:24px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8f9fa; border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;\">\n<th style=\"width:8%; padding:8px;\">Nr.<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:82%; padding:8px;\">Item<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:10%; padding:8px; text-align:center;\">Polung<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">27<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Gerade diese Klasse arbeitet im Unterricht nur sehr z\u00f6gernd mit.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">28<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Eine so engagierte und interessierte Klasse wie diese hatte ich bisher selten.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">29<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse sind pers\u00f6nliche Gespr\u00e4che mit Sch\u00fclern besonders leicht m\u00f6glich.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">30<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Gerade diese Klasse ist im Unterricht auffallend teilnahmslos.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">31<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die Sch\u00fcler dieser Klasse machen besonders gut im Unterricht mit.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">32<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse f\u00e4llt mir der pers\u00f6nliche Kontakt zu den Sch\u00fclern besonders leicht.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">33<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Das Lehrer-Sch\u00fcler-Verh\u00e4ltnis empfinde ich in dieser Klasse als au\u00dferordentlich herzlich.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 style=\"margin-top:24px; border-bottom:1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom:6px;\">Skala 4: Disziplinarverst\u00f6\u00dfe<\/h3>\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin-bottom:24px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8f9fa; border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;\">\n<th style=\"width:8%; padding:8px;\">Nr.<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:82%; padding:8px;\">Item<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:10%; padding:8px; text-align:center;\">Polung<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">34<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">W\u00e4hrend des Unterrichts sind diese Sch\u00fcler unkonzentrierter als andere Klassen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">35<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Unterrichtsst\u00f6rendes Verhalten h\u00e4lt sich in dieser Klasse in Grenzen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">36<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse wird w\u00e4hrend des Unterrichts besonders viel Unfug getrieben.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">37<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">In dieser Klasse muss ich st\u00e4ndig um ein Mindestma\u00df an Ordnung ringen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">38<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Mit dieser Klasse habe ich ungew\u00f6hnlich viele Disziplinprobleme.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">39<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die Sch\u00fcler in dieser Klasse befolgen meine Anordnungen auch ohne dass ich mehrmals darum bitten muss.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">40<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die Disziplin ist in dieser Klasse erstaunlich gut.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">41<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Man wird selten beim Unterrichten in einer Klasse so viel gest\u00f6rt wie in dieser.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3 style=\"margin-top:24px; border-bottom:1px solid #ccc; padding-bottom:6px;\">Skala 5: Emotionalit\u00e4t<\/h3>\n<table style=\"width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; text-align:left; margin-bottom:24px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background:#f8f9fa; border-bottom:1px solid #ddd;\">\n<th style=\"width:8%; padding:8px;\">Nr.<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:82%; padding:8px;\">Item<\/th>\n<th style=\"width:10%; padding:8px; text-align:center;\">Polung<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">42<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Diese Klasse ist ausgesprochen humorvoll.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">43<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die meisten Sch\u00fcler meiner jetzigen Klasse lassen sich kaum f\u00fcr etwas begeistern.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">44<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die Sch\u00fcler dieser Klasse geben ihre Meinungen mir gegen\u00fcber offener zum Ausdruck als in anderen Klassen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"border-bottom:1px solid #eee;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">45<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die Sch\u00fcler dieser Klasse k\u00f6nnten sich mit ihren Gef\u00fchlsausbr\u00fcchen ruhig etwas mehr im Zaum halten.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">46<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;\">Die Sch\u00fcler dieser Klasse k\u00f6nnen sich oft \u00fcber Kleinigkeiten so richtig freuen.<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px; text-align:center;\">+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Classroom Climate Questionnaire (Fragebogen zum Unterrichtsklima, CCQ) is a 46-item teacher-report psychometric instrument developed by Dann and colleagues to measure five dimensions of classroom environment: peer social relations, aggression against the teacher, cooperation, disciplinary violations, and emotionality.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","categories":[25819,55,2,7243],"tags":[10203,2994,26357,2976,26356,21890,26355],"class_list":["post-8898","psych_scale","type-psych_scale","status-publish","hentry","category-classroom-management","category-educational-psychology","category-psychometrics","category-school-psychology","tag-ccq","tag-classroom-climate","tag-disciplinary-violations","tag-educational-assessment","tag-school-aggression","tag-teacher-perception","tag-unterrichtsklima"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale\/8898","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/psych_scale"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8898"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale\/8898\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8898"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8898"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8898"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}