The Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLPII)<\/strong> is a widely recognized, multidimensional psychometric instrument developed by Nola J. Pender<\/a>, Susan Noble Walker, and Karen R. Sechrist to measure the frequency of self-reported engagement in health-promoting behaviors. Rooted fundamentally in Pender’s Health Promotion Model<\/a> (HPM), the instrument assesses a behavioral pattern composed of self-initiated actions and perceptions that serve to maintain or enhance the level of wellness, self-actualization, and personal fulfillment of the individual. The HPLPII constitutes a substantial revision of the original 47-item Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP) published in 1987, refining item wording, updating nutritional and physical activity guidelines, and expanding the assessment to 52 items across six distinct behavioral dimensions: Health Responsibility<\/em> (9 items), Physical Activity<\/em> (8 items), Nutrition<\/em> (9 items), Spiritual Growth<\/em> (9 items), Interpersonal Relations<\/em> (9 items), and Stress Management<\/em> (8 items).<\/p>\n Responses are recorded using a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Never<\/em>) to 4 (Routinely<\/em>), yielding both an overall health-promoting lifestyle score and individual subscale scores expressed as arithmetic means. Across extensive psychometric investigations, the HPLPII has demonstrated exceptional internal consistency, with total scale Cronbach’s alpha<\/a> coefficients typically ranging from .92 to .95, and subscale coefficients consistently falling between .75 and .90 across diverse demographic cohorts, clinical populations, and linguistic adaptations. Construct validity is supported by both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, verifying the six-dimensional structure, as well as significant convergent associations with measures of health-related quality of life, perceived self-efficacy, internal health locus of control, and psychological well-being. Today, the HPLPII serves as a benchmark assessment in clinical nursing, behavioral medicine, public health epidemiology, and occupational health research worldwide.<\/p>\n Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II, HPLPII, Nola Pender, Health Promotion Model, health-promoting behaviors, physical activity, nutrition, stress management, spiritual growth, interpersonal relations, health responsibility, psychometrics, health-related quality of life.<\/p>\n The Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLPII) was developed by a team of prominent nurse researchers and behavioral scientists affiliated with the University of Nebraska Medical Center, Northern Illinois University, and the University of Michigan:<\/p>\n The primary developmental repository and copyright administration for the instrument have been maintained through the University of Michigan’s institutional repository (Deep Blue<\/a>), ensuring standardized academic access to the instrument, scoring guides, and international language translations.<\/p>\n The overarching purpose of the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLPII) is to quantitatively operationalize, assess, and monitor the multidimensional pattern of self-initiated behaviors that individuals enact to maintain or elevate their current state of health, functional competence, and psychological flourishing. Distinct from primary prevention paradigms that conceptualize health behavior primarily through the lens of pathogenic defense, disease avoidance, or risk factor mitigation (e.g., smoking cessation, immunization, screening adherence), the HPLPII was intentionally formulated to capture actions oriented toward actualizing inherent human health potential, enhancing vitality, and fostering holistic well-being.<\/p>\n In empirical health science research, the HPLPII is widely utilized as either a primary outcome variable or a critical mediating\/moderating construct. Investigators employ the tool to:<\/p>\n Within clinical nursing practice, ambulatory care, cardiac rehabilitation, oncology survivorship, and primary care settings, the HPLPII functions as a diagnostic and behavioral profiling instrument. By reviewing an individual’s total and dimension-specific profile, clinicians can rapidly identify specific areas of behavioral vulnerability\u2014such as deficits in nutritional balancing, irregular physical exertion, inadequate stress management, or social isolation\u2014and collaboratively design targeted, patient-centered lifestyle prescriptions. The instrument’s modular subscale structure allows healthcare teams to benchmark behavioral change longitudinally, offering objective metrics for patient self-management and motivational interviewing interventions.<\/p>\n The construct assessed by the HPLPII is the health-promoting lifestyle<\/strong>, defined theoretically as a multidimensional constellation of ongoing self-initiated actions and perceptions that serve to maintain or enhance an individual’s level of wellness, self-actualization, and life fulfillment. Rather than treating healthy living as a single homogeneous behavior, the HPLPII operationalizes the construct across six distinct, complementary behavioral dimensions:<\/p>\n Health Responsibility<\/em> (9 items) assesses an individual’s active engagement in personal wellness self-advocacy, health information-seeking, and systematic bodily surveillance. This dimension reflects an internal locus of causality regarding one’s physical state. Behavioral indicators include routinely inspecting one’s body for warning signs or unusual physiological alterations, consulting healthcare professionals promptly when symptoms manifest, questioning clinical providers to ensure complete comprehension of medical instructions, reading educational materials, and attending community health workshops.<\/p>\n Physical Activity<\/em> (8 items) captures regular participation in planned, structured exercise, incidental bodily movement, and recreational physical pursuits designed to foster cardiovascular fitness, muscular endurance, flexibility, and overall somatic vigor. Items assess adherence to planned exercise regimens, light-to-moderate physical exertion (e.g., sustained walking 30\u201340 minutes several times weekly), vigorous aerobic activity, structured flexibility and stretching routines, integrating movement into daily activities (such as taking stairs), and physiological self-monitoring (e.g., checking pulse rate or monitoring target heart rate).<\/p>\n Nutrition<\/em> (9 items) assesses intentional dietary choices and eating patterns aligned with evidence-based dietary recommendations for sustained metabolic health and disease prevention. This dimension measures behavioral habits such as choosing balanced meals, following dietary guidelines regarding whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and lean proteins, deliberately limiting the intake of refined sugars, cholesterol, and saturated fats, reading nutritional labels on packaged foods, and maintaining consistent metabolic routines such as eating breakfast daily.<\/p>\n Spiritual Growth<\/em> (9 items)\u2014formerly conceptualized in the original HPLP as self-actualization\u2014encompasses intrinsic intrapsychic resources, personal development, existential purpose, and holistic transcendence. This dimension operationalizes psychological flourishing, self-awareness, personal growth, existential goal-directedness, a sense of peace and contentment, looking forward to the future with optimism, and experiencing a subjective connection to a transcendent force or broader purpose greater than the self.<\/p>\n Interpersonal Relations<\/em> (9 items) focuses on the development and maintenance of meaningful social connections, relational intimacy, emotional communication, and mutual social support networks. Behavioral indicators include discussing personal concerns with trusted confidants, demonstrating affection, warmth, and praise toward others, actively seeking relational intimacy, using collaborative dialogue and compromise to navigate conflicts, and cultivating a reliable social safety net of caring peers and family members.<\/p>\n Stress Management<\/em> (8 items) measures the deployment of both physiological and cognitive coping strategies aimed at regulating psychological distress, balancing life demands, and preserving homeostatic stability. This dimension includes obtaining restorative sleep, pacing physical activities to prevent exhaustion, balancing vocational demands with leisure, engaging in formal relaxation or meditation techniques (e.g., 15\u201320 minutes daily), cultivating calming cognitions at bedtime, accepting immutable life circumstances, and utilizing systematic stress-reduction strategies.<\/p>\n The theoretical framework underpinning the HPLPII is Pender’s Health Promotion Model<\/a> (HPM), initially formulated by Nola J. Pender in 1982 and revised substantially in 1996. The HPM was established to provide an integrative nursing perspective on health behaviors that operates independently of threat- or illness-avoidance frameworks such as Becker’s Health Belief Model<\/a> (HBM).<\/p>\n The HPM conceptualizes individuals as holistic biopsychosocial organisms that interact continuously with their interpersonal and physical environments, actively pursuing conditions of positive health. The foundational theoretical assumptions include:<\/p>\n The revised HPM categorizes the determinants of health-promoting behavior into three major structural domains:<\/p>\n The psychometric validity of the HPLPII has been established through extensive empirical testing across clinical, community, occupational, and cross-cultural cohorts.<\/p>\n Construct validity was initially established during the iterative transition from the 47-item HPLP to the 52-item HPLPII. In developmental investigations conducted by Walker, Sechrist, and Pender, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) demonstrated that all 52 items loaded significantly onto their hypothesized six dimensions, confirming construct differentiation. In a benchmark study by Walker, Volkan, Sechrist, and Pender (1988) examining lifestyle patterns across age cohorts, construct validity was corroborated by showing that the instrument reliably differentiated lifestyle patterns between younger adults, middle-aged adults, and older adults.<\/p>\n Subsequent psychometric investigations have subjected the six-factor model to structural equation modeling (SEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For example, Mohamadian et al. (2011) utilized SEM to test Pender’s model among adolescent populations, verifying that the six latent constructs of the HPLPII fit observed behavioral indicators well and mediated the path between cognitive-perceptual factors and health-related quality of life.<\/p>\n Convergent validity is substantiated by robust, statistically significant correlations between HPLPII scores and conceptually related psychological and physiological indices:<\/p>\n Cross-cultural adaptations have replicated the instrument’s valid construct space across numerous cultural groups. Investigations in Iran by Aubi et al. (2012), Mohammadi Zeidi et al. (2012), and Taheri Tanjani et al. (2016) among community-dwelling adults and older populations confirmed convergent and discriminant validity using multi-trait scaling analysis and demonstrated that HPLPII scores accurately discriminated between individuals with controlled versus uncontrolled chronic non-communicable diseases.<\/p>\n The Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II demonstrates exceptional reliability across multiple measurement parameters, including internal consistency and temporal stability.<\/p>\n In standard psychometric evaluations of the English instrument, the total 52-item HPLPII consistently yields a total scale Cronbach’s alpha ranging between .92 and .94, indicating outstanding internal consistency without excessive item redundancy. Subscale alpha coefficients consistently meet or exceed the standard .70 benchmark for psychological instruments:<\/p>\n In international psychometric studies, these robust indices have been largely replicated. For instance, in the Persian validation by Mohammadi Zeidi, Pakpour, and Zeidi (2012), the overall scale Cronbach’s alpha was .94, with subscale alphas ranging from .79 (Stress Management) to .91 (Physical Activity). Similarly, Taheri Tanjani et al. (2016) reported a total scale alpha of .82 in an Iranian geriatric cohort.<\/p>\n The stability of the HPLPII over time has been verified across several test-retest intervals ranging from two to four weeks in stable populations:<\/p>\n The structural dimensionality of the HPLPII has been investigated using both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) across diverse international populations.<\/p>\n During the developmental phase of the HPLPII, Walker, Sechrist, and Pender conducted principal components analysis (PCA) followed by both orthogonal (Varimax) and oblique (Promax\/Oblimin) rotations to delineate the empirical clustering of the expanded 52-item pool. The exploratory analyses supported a six-factor solution:<\/p>\n Subsequent contemporary structural evaluations have used CFA to evaluate both first-order six-factor models and hierarchical (second-order single general factor with six first-order sub-factors) specifications. Representative fit indices from contemporary structural investigations (e.g., Mohammadi Zeidi et al., 2012; Taheri Tanjani et al., 2016) demonstrate adequate to good fit:<\/p>\n While some studies have noted minor shared error variance between specific lifestyle behaviors\u2014such as nutrition items and health responsibility information-seeking\u2014the six-factor oblique model consistently demonstrates superior statistical fit compared to unidimensional or three-factor alternative models.<\/p>\n The Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLPII) is structured as follows:<\/p>\n The revised Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II was finalized and released by Susan Noble Walker, Karen R. Sechrist, and Nola J. Pender in 1995<\/strong> (with accompanying foundational documentation published in 1996).<\/p>\n Aubi, E., Shadnoush, M., Nazarzadeh, M., Bidel, Z., Ranaei, A., & Delpisheh, A. (2012). Translation and assessment of validity and reliability of the health-promoting lifestyle questionnaire, using factor analysis. Pejouhandeh<\/em>, 17(3), 114\u2013120.<\/p>\n Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control<\/em>. W. H. Freeman and Company.<\/p>\n Mohamadian, H., Eftekhar, H., Rahimi, A., Mohamad, H. A., Shojaiezadeh, D., & Montazeri, A. (2011). Predicting health-related quality of life by using a health promotion model among Iranian adolescent girls: A structural equation modeling approach. Nursing & Health Sciences<\/em>, 13(2), 141\u2013148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1442-2018.2011.00593.x<\/a><\/p>\n Mohammadi Zeidi, I., Pakpour, A. H., & Zeidi, B. M. (2012). Reliability and validity of Persian version of the health-promoting lifestyle profile. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences<\/em>, 21(1), 102\u2013113.<\/p>\n Pender, N. J. (1996). Health promotion in nursing practice<\/em> (3rd ed.). Appleton & Lange.<\/p>\n Pender, N. J., Murdaugh, C. L., & Parsons, M. A. (2014). Health promotion in nursing practice<\/em> (7th ed.). Pearson.<\/p>\n Taheri Tanjani, P., Azadbakht, M., Garmaroudi, G., Sahaf, R., & Fekrizadeh, Z. (2016). Validity and reliability of Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II in the Iranian elderly. International Journal of Preventive Medicine<\/em>, 7, 74. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/2008-7802.182731<\/a><\/p>\n Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. (1987). The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research<\/em>, 36(2), 76\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00006199-198703000-00002<\/a><\/p>\n Walker, S. N., Volkan, K., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. (1988). Health-promoting life styles of older adults: Comparisons with young and middle-aged adults, correlates and patterns. Advances in Nursing Science<\/em>, 11(1), 76\u201390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00012272-198810000-00008<\/a><\/p>\n2. Keywords<\/h2>\n
3. Authors<\/h2>\n
\n
4. Purpose<\/h2>\n
Research Applications<\/h3>\n
\n
Clinical and Preventive Medicine Applications<\/h3>\n
5. Psychological Construct<\/h2>\n
1. Health Responsibility<\/h3>\n
2. Physical Activity<\/h3>\n
3. Nutrition<\/h3>\n
4. Spiritual Growth<\/h3>\n
5. Interpersonal Relations<\/h3>\n
6. Stress Management<\/h3>\n
6. Theoretical Framework<\/h2>\n
Core Assumptions of the Health Promotion Model<\/h3>\n
\n
Key Model Components and Psychological Mechanisms<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
7. Validity<\/h2>\n
Construct Validity<\/h3>\n
Convergent and Discriminant Validity<\/h3>\n
\n
Cross-Cultural and Population Validity<\/h3>\n
8. Reliability<\/h2>\n
Internal Consistency<\/h3>\n
\n
Temporal Stability (Test-Retest Reliability)<\/h3>\n
\n
9. Factor Analysis<\/h2>\n
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)<\/h3>\n
\n
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Model Fit<\/h3>\n
\n
10. Instrument \/ Measurement Tool<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
11. Permissions & Fee and Test Year<\/h2>\n
\n
12. References<\/h2>\n
13. Items of the Scale (Questionnaire)<\/h2>\n