The Variety Seeking Tendency Scale (VARSEEK)<\/strong> is an eight-item, self-report psychometric instrument engineered to measure an individual’s intrinsic predisposition to seek variety in consumption choices, specifically calibrated within the domain of food and fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG<\/a>). Developed originally by Hans C.M. van Trijp and Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp (1992) and extensively validated in consumer psychology by Van Trijp, Hoyer, and Inman (1996)<\/a>, the instrument operationalizes variety-seeking behavior as an internally driven, hedonic motivation to switch between alternatives for the direct purpose of stimulation, novelty, and change, rather than as a consequence of dissatisfaction, price promotions, or situational constraints. Evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale<\/a> ranging from 1 (“Completely Disagree”) to 5 (“Completely Agree”), the scale exhibits a robust unidimensional structure confirmed across diverse international samples. Psychometric evaluations demonstrate strong internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha<\/a> coefficients consistently falling between .80 and .88, accompanied by high composite reliability. Construct validity is supported through positive correlations with generalized Optimum Stimulation Level<\/a> (OSL) indices\u2014such as the Change Seekers Index (CSI) and the Exploratory Consumer Behaviors Questionnaire (ECBQ)\u2014while retaining strict discriminant validity from consumer innovativeness, brand involvement, and derived switching patterns. The VARSEEK scale remains a benchmark measurement tool across nutritional science, behavioral economics, and marketing science for categorizing sensory-specific satiety, portfolio diversification, and consumer food choice architecture.<\/p>\n variety seeking, VARSEEK scale, consumer behavior, optimum stimulation level, brand switching, sensory-specific satiety, exploratory consumer behavior, psychometrics, food choice, consumer psychology<\/p>\n The principal investigators responsible for the conceptualization, psychometric formulation, and empirical testing of the VARSEEK scale are:<\/p>\n The primary objective of the Variety Seeking Tendency Scale (VARSEEK) is to isolate and quantify an individual’s enduring trait to switch among consumption alternatives solely for the psychological reward of stimulation and change. In consumer decision-making research, brand and product switching frequently occurs due to extrinsic, non-motivational drivers\u2014termed derived variety-seeking<\/em>\u2014such as temporary price discounts, stockouts, changing situational contexts (e.g., eating alone versus dining with guests), or multi-person household preferences. In contrast, true variety-seeking behavior<\/em> (intrinsic variety seeking) is motivated by an internal need to alleviate boredom, alter sensory inputs, or explore the sensory spectrum within an otherwise acceptable set of familiar alternatives.<\/p>\n Prior to the introduction of VARSEEK, consumer researchers often attempted to infer variety-seeking behavior ex post from longitudinal panel scanner data or utilized overly broad general sensation-seeking scales that lacked domain-specific predictive validity. Broad exploratory scales failed to explain why a consumer might be intensely adventurous when ordering meals or snacks while demonstrating intense conservatism in financial decisions or recreational activities. The VARSEEK scale resolved this methodological limitation by providing a parsimonious, domain-specific instrument tailored to everyday consumption, primarily focusing on food and beverage environments where sensory-specific satiety and low switching costs predominate.<\/p>\n In research and clinical-behavioral settings, VARSEEK is applied to:<\/p>\n The psychological construct captured by the VARSEEK scale is intrinsic variety seeking in consumption choices<\/strong>. This construct reflects a stable dispositional trait characterized by an internal need for variation across repeated consumption episodes. It is conceptually grounded at the intersection of personality psychology, sensory physiology, and cognitive evaluation.<\/p>\n Psychometric clarity requires distinguishing between intrinsic and derived variety seeking. Derived variety seeking<\/em> is transactional and circumstantial; a consumer alternates choices because a competitor is on sale, their primary brand is unavailable, or diverse tastes within a household necessitate purchasing multiple options simultaneously. Conversely, intrinsic variety seeking<\/em> represents a psychological process wherein the act of switching is intrinsically reinforcing. The consumer shifts between items not because of dissatisfaction with the previous alternative, but because the utility derived from consuming the same item declines due to repetitive stimulation. VARSEEK measures this intrinsic drive.<\/p>\n Variety seeking is fundamentally distinct from consumer innovativeness<\/a>. Innovativeness involves the promptness and eagerness with which an individual adopts novel, newly launched products or technological advancements. In contrast, variety seeking can occur entirely within a closed, well-known evoked set of mature alternatives. For example, a high variety seeker may cycle rhythmically through five conventional flavors of potato chips or soft drinks without ever adopting an entirely new product. While innovativeness focuses on novelty adoption, variety seeking focuses on alternation dynamics across familiar sensory landscapes.<\/p>\n Although VARSEEK taps into curiosity about unfamiliar foods, it is distinct from general sensation seeking<\/a> (e.g., Marvin Zuckerman’s construct, which involves physical risk-taking, thrill seeking, and disinhibition). VARSEEK functions at a sub-clinical, daily hedonic level. Furthermore, it operates inversely to food neophobia (the pathological or developmental fear of novel foods). While a food neophobic individual actively rejects unfamiliar foods due to perceived danger or sensory aversion, an individual low in VARSEEK merely possesses high contentment with culinary monotony without necessarily exhibiting an anxiety-driven fear of novel foods.<\/p>\n The theoretical architecture of the VARSEEK scale is anchored in three foundational psychological theories: Optimum Stimulation Level (OSL) theory, the concept of Sensory-Specific Satiety (SSS), and Dual-Process Hedonic Adaptation models.<\/p>\n Pioneered by psychophysiologists such as Daniel Berlyne<\/a> (1960) and adapted into consumer behavior frameworks by Raju (1980) and Steenkamp and Baumgartner (1992), OSL posits that organisms maintain an internalized, homeostatic baseline of arousal. If an individual\u2019s environmental stimulation drops below their OSL, they experience boredom and are motivated to engage in exploratory behaviors\u2014such as novelty seeking, risk taking, or variety seeking\u2014to elevate arousal back to the optimum. Conversely, if stimulation surpasses the OSL, the individual seeks familiar, routine environments to attenuate arousal. VARSEEK conceptualizes food variety seeking as a specific, low-risk manifestation of an individual’s attempt to restore arousal to their optimum baseline within the micro-domain of daily sustenance.<\/p>\n Developed by Barbara Rolls and colleagues in nutritional neuroscience, sensory-specific satiety describes the physiological and sensory phenomenon whereby the hedonic pleasure derived from a specific food declines as it is consumed, while unconsumed foods exhibiting different sensory properties (taste, texture, temperature, appearance) retain their hedonic value. Individuals vary substantially in the rate and intensity with which sensory-specific satiety manifests. High VARSEEK scorers experience accelerated sensory fatigue with repetitive sensory profiles, motivating frequent alternation across meals and snacking intervals to maintain overall gustatory pleasure.<\/p>\n The scale integrates Berlyne’s epistemic curiosity framework, suggesting that variety seeking functions via exploratory drive. Human cognitive systems adapt to constant stimuli through habituation. In food consumption, habituation reduces the emotional reward of repetitive choices. Individuals with high variety-seeking traits proactively introduce variance into daily meals and snacks to counter hedonic adaptation, actively exploring unfamiliar sensory combinations to elicit positive affective responses.<\/p>\n The psychometric validity of the VARSEEK scale has been extensively verified across multiple studies involving diverse consumer cohorts, retail settings, and experimental conditions.<\/p>\n Construct validity has been established by evaluating VARSEEK alongside validated measures of generalized exploratory behavior. Van Trijp and Steenkamp (1992) and Van Trijp et al. (1996) demonstrated strong, statistically significant positive correlations between VARSEEK scores and generalized arousal indices, such as the Change Seekers Index (CSI; $r = .45$<\/span> to $.58, p < .001$) and Raju\u2019s (1980) Exploratory Consumer Behaviors Questionnaire (ECBQ;$<\/span>r = .42$ to $.53, p < .001$). Furthermore, the scale correlates moderately with the Openness to Experience domain of the Five-Factor Model<\/a> ($r = .34$<\/span> to $.41$<\/span>).<\/p>\n Discriminant validity was established through confirmatory factor models demonstrating that VARSEEK represents an empirical construct distinct from related consumer traits:<\/p>\n The ultimate criterion for VARSEEK lies in its capacity to predict actual choice switching in naturalistic and controlled environments:<\/p>\n The internal consistency and temporal stability of the VARSEEK scale have demonstrated strong performance across Dutch, American, British, and wider European consumer samples.<\/p>\n Across validation studies, the eight-item VARSEEK scale demonstrates high internal reliability:<\/p>\n Evaluations assessing test-retest reliability over four- to six-week intervals have yielded intraclass correlation coefficients ($ICC$<\/span>) between .76 and .82<\/strong>, demonstrating that while consumption episodes fluctuate situationally, the underlying variety-seeking trait remains stable over time.<\/p>\n Extensive exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses validate the unidimensional factor structure of the VARSEEK instrument.<\/p>\n Initial principal components and maximum likelihood exploratory factor analyses (with both varimax and oblimin rotations) performed by Van Trijp and Steenkamp revealed a single dominant eigenvalue substantially exceeding the Kaiser criterion (eigenvalue 1 > 3.8), accounting for over 50% to 58% of the total variance. Subsequent eigenvalues dropped precipitously below 0.85, generating an unambiguous scree plot elbow that decisively substantiates a unidimensional construct<\/span>.<\/p>\n Structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirm strong goodness-of-fit indices for the single-factor model across multiple empirical investigations. Representative fit indices reported across standard validation studies include:<\/p>\n Standardized factor loadings ($lambda$<\/span>) across the eight indicators are uniformly robust, ranging from .55 to .83:<\/p>\n Measurement invariance testing across gender and age strata supports full configural and metric invariance, and partial scalar invariance, enabling comparative research across demographic cohorts.<\/p>\n Response Scale:<\/strong> Scoring Note:<\/strong> Items 3 and 4 are reverse-scored. Higher average or sum scores reflect a greater variety-seeking tendency in food consumption.<\/p>\n The Variety Seeking Tendency Scale (VARSEEK) is an 8-item psychometric instrument measuring intrinsic motivation to seek variety in consumer food choices.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","categories":[745,1076,2],"tags":[2275,2665,2666,35,2664,2663],"class_list":["post-584","psych_scale","type-psych_scale","status-publish","hentry","category-behavioral-economics","category-consumer-psychology","category-psychometrics","tag-consumer-behavior","tag-food-choices","tag-optimum-stimulation-level","tag-scale-validation","tag-variety-seeking","tag-varseek"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale\/584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/psych_scale"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale\/584\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Keywords<\/h2>\n
Authors<\/h2>\n
\n
Purpose<\/h2>\n
\n
Psychological Construct<\/h2>\n
Intrinsic vs. Derived Variety Seeking<\/h3>\n
Distinction from Consumer Innovativeness<\/h3>\n
Distinction from Food Neophobia and Sensation Seeking<\/h3>\n
Theoretical Framework<\/h2>\n
1. Optimum Stimulation Level (OSL) Theory<\/h3>\n
2. Sensory-Specific Satiety (SSS)<\/h3>\n
3. Hedonic Adaptation and Curiosity Drive<\/h3>\n
Validity<\/h2>\n
Construct and Convergent Validity<\/h3>\n
Discriminant Validity<\/h3>\n
\n
Predictive and Criterion-Related Validity<\/h3>\n
\n
Reliability<\/h2>\n
Internal Consistency<\/h3>\n
\n
Test-Retest Stability<\/h3>\n
Factor Analysis<\/h2>\n
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)<\/h3>\n
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)<\/h3>\n
\n
Factor Loadings<\/h3>\n
\n
Instrument \/ Measurement Tool<\/h2>\n
\n
\nightarrow 5, 2
\nightarrow 4, 3
\nightarrow 3, 4
\nightarrow 2, 5
\nightarrow 1$).<\/li>\n\n
\n
Permissions & Fee and Test Year<\/h2>\n
\n
References<\/h2>\n
\n
Items of the Scale<\/h2>\n
\n 5-point Likert scale (1 = Completely Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely Agree)<\/span><\/p>\n\n