The Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery (QMI)<\/strong>, developed in its shortened 35-item format by Peter W. Sheehan (1967)<\/a> based on the seminal 150-item psychometric instrument by George Herbert Betts (1909)<\/a>, represents one of the foundational and most enduring instruments for assessing multi-sensory mental imagery vividness in psychological science. Unlike single-modality instruments such as the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ)<\/a>, the QMI captures subjective clarity and perceptual realism across seven distinct sensory domains: visual, auditory, cutaneous (tactile), kinesthetic, gustatory, olfactory, and organic (visceral\/interoceptive) modalities. Each modality is probed via five items rated along an authentic 7-point Likert-type vividness continuum ranging from 1 (“Perfectly clear and as vivid as the normal vision\/perception”<\/em>) to 7 (“No image present at all, you only ‘know’ that you are thinking of the object”<\/em>). Consequently, lower total scores (range: 35\u2013245) signify superior phenomenological clarity and strength of voluntarily evoked mental representations. Psychometrically, the shortened QMI demonstrates high internal consistency across diverse populations (overall Cronbach\u2019s alpha typically spanning .88 to .95; subscale alphas ranging from .67 to .87) and robust test-retest reliability ($r = .74$<\/span> to $.88$<\/span> across short-to-medium intervals). Factor-analytic investigations reveal a dominant general imagery factor alongside seven correlated first-order sensory dimensions. The instrument has facilitated critical empirical advancements in cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychopathology (e.g., trauma intrusive imagery, depression, and somatic disorders), hypnotic susceptibility research, athletic performance enhancement, and the contemporary investigation of perceptual extremes such as aphantasia<\/a> and hyperphantasia.<\/p>\n Mental imagery, vividness, Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery, QMI, multi-sensory imagery, Peter Sheehan, George Herbert Betts, visual imagery, auditory imagery, kinesthetic imagery, interoception, aphantasia, psychometrics<\/p>\n The shortened version of the Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery was developed by Peter W. Sheehan, Ph.D.<\/strong> (1937\u20132019), an eminent Australian psychologist and cognitive psychophysiologist. Sheehan served as Professor of Psychology and Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Research) at the University of Queensland<\/a>, and subsequently as Vice-Chancellor of the Australian Catholic University<\/a>. Renowned internationally for his pioneering experimental contributions to the nature of hypnosis, memory distortion, social psychological dynamics, and mental simulation, Sheehan standardized and shortened Betts\u2019 scale while working in the Department of Psychology at the University of Sydney and collaborating with researchers at the Institute for Experimental Psychiatry in Pennsylvania.<\/p>\n The instrument directly traces its intellectual and operational lineage to George Herbert Betts, Ph.D.<\/strong> (1868\u20131934), an influential American educational psychologist and student of Edward L. Thorndike<\/a> at Teachers College, Columbia University<\/a>. Betts published his monumental doctoral dissertation, The Distribution and Functions of Mental Imagery<\/em>, in 1909, constructing a comprehensive 150-item inventory designed to map individual differences in imagery across every recognized human sensory channel. Sheehan\u2019s psychometric condensation in 1967 reduced Betts\u2019 cumbersome inventory by over 75% while preserving its multi-factorial breadth and content validity.<\/p>\n The primary purpose of the shortened Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery (QMI) is to provide an efficient, psychometrically sound, standardized self-report index of an individual\u2019s capacity to intentionally generate clear, vivid, and phenomenologically authentic sensory experiences in the absence of actual external sensory stimulation. Whereas early twentieth-century introspectionist psychology debated whether mental imagery was a uniform cognitive faculty or an idiosyncratic epiphenomenon, the QMI operationalized imagery as a multi-dimensional, quantifiable trait that varies reliably across individuals and across specific sensory modalities within the same individual.<\/p>\n In modern cognitive psychology and neuroscience, the QMI serves as a critical measure for exploring how mental simulation shares neurocomputational architecture with direct perception. It enables researchers to quantify how variations in multi-sensory imagery vividness influence episodic memory recall, prospective planning, spatial navigation, linguistic comprehension, and mental rotation. The inclusion of non-visual modalities makes the QMI exceptionally valuable: while visual imagery dominates the experimental literature, human cognition relies profoundly on auditory imagery (e.g., inner speech, musical rehearsal), kinesthetic feedback (e.g., motor simulation and athletic execution), and interoceptive or organic awareness (e.g., autonomic regulation, pain anticipation, and emotional empathy).<\/p>\n Within clinical psychology and psychiatry, the QMI is applied to assess cognitive patterns in psychological disorders. For instance, in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)<\/a>, involuntary intrusive memories often present as hyper-vivid, multi-sensory reenactments featuring olfactory, tactile, and visceral distress. Conversely, major depressive disorder is often characterized by blunted imagery vividness for future positive events, accompanied by impaired interoceptive processing. In eating disorders, gustatory and olfactory imagery biases heavily correlate with compulsive craving and body-image distortion. Additionally, the QMI has a historical role in hypnotherapy and hypnotic suggestibility research, where baseline imagery vividness across sensory modalities predicts an individual’s response to sensory suggestions, analgesia, and age-regression protocols.<\/p>\n The psychological construct assessed by the QMI is imagery vividness<\/strong> across multiple sensory modalities. In psychophysics and phenomenology, “vividness” refers to the richness, clarity, detail, and sensory realism of a self-generated mental representation relative to the qualia produced during actual perceptual contact with an environmental stimulus. Vividness incorporates the dimension of subjective sensory brightness and resolution, distinct from the orthogonal construct of imagery controllability<\/em> (the capacity to manipulate or transform an image at will). The QMI measures voluntary, goal-directed vividness across seven distinct operational dimensions:<\/p>\n The theoretical architecture of the QMI is rooted in classic introspectionism, contemporary cognitive science, and grounded or embodied cognition. The conceptual basis was initiated by Sir Francis Galton (1880)<\/a> in his famous “breakfast table” investigations. Galton discovered vast, continuous individual differences in the subjective vividness of mental imagery, noting that while some individuals reported internal representations comparable to waking physical perception, others experienced no subjective sensory qualities whatsoever.<\/p>\n In 1909, George Herbert Betts synthesized Galton’s observations within the structuralist paradigm, arguing that mental imagery is not an isolated cognitive curiosity, but a primary mode of thought that parallels sensory anatomy. Betts asserted that every sensory receptor surface that informs the central nervous system must have a corresponding introspective imagery domain. When Peter Sheehan revisited Betts\u2019 instrument in 1967, cognitive psychology was undergoing the Cognitive Revolution<\/a>, shifting away from radical behaviorism’s rejection of private mental events toward an empirical analysis of internal representations.<\/p>\n Sheehan\u2019s work aligned with Allan Paivio\u2019s Dual-Coding Theory (1971)<\/a>, which posits that human cognition operates via two distinct yet interacting representational systems: a nonverbal, imaginal system specialized for representing sensory characteristics, and a verbal system specialized for linguistic units. The QMI operationalizes the nonverbal system by requiring participants to suppress verbal propositional labeling and directly access sensory memory stores.<\/p>\n Modern cognitive neuroscience provides a biological framework for the QMI through Stephen Kosslyn\u2019s Depictive Theory of Mental Imagery<\/em> and modern Embodied Cognition<\/em> frameworks (e.g., Lawrence Barsalou\u2019s Perceptual Symbol Systems). Functional neuroimaging studies confirm that voluntary mental imagery reactivates the primary and secondary sensory cortices that process real-world stimuli. When an individual imagines a visual scene, primary visual cortex (V1) and ventral temporal pathways activate; auditory imagery recruits Heschl’s gyrus and auditory association areas; motor imagery engages the supplementary motor area (SMA) and premotor cortex; and organic imagery involves the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex. The QMI thus reflects top-down neural simulations, wherein frontoparietal control networks re-instantiate sensory patterns within modality-specific sensory cortices.<\/p>\n The shortened QMI has undergone extensive empirical validation, demonstrating strong construct, convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity across several decades of cognitive and clinical research:<\/p>\n The psychometric reliability of the shortened QMI has been documented across normative, academic, and clinical samples:<\/p>\n The underlying factor structure of the 35-item QMI has been evaluated through both Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) across diverse cultural and language cohorts:<\/p>\n The operational characteristics and administration specifications of the shortened Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery are detailed below:<\/p>\n The shortened Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery was published in its standardized format in 1967<\/strong> by Dr. Peter W. Sheehan in the Journal of Clinical Psychology<\/em>. The conceptual parent instrument by Dr. George Herbert Betts was originally published in 1909<\/strong> by Teachers College, Columbia University, and is firmly established in the public domain. Sheehan’s 1967 shortened 35-item scale is widely accessible in the peer-reviewed psychological literature for scholarly, academic, and non-commercial scientific research without fee. Researchers and clinicians should cite the foundational validation publication by Sheehan (1967) in all empirical reports. Any commercial reproduction, inclusion in commercial assessment software packages, or proprietary diagnostic tool development should be verified in accordance with journal publisher permissions and standard copyright conventions.<\/p>\n Instructions:<\/strong> The aim of this test is to determine the vividness of your imagery. The measure of your imagery is to be determined by the rating you assign to each item. Read each item carefully, then bring the image to mind, and rate its vividness according to the following 7-point rating scale:<\/p>\n The Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery (QMI) is a 35-item condensed inventory developed by Peter W. Sheehan (1967) based on Betts’ (1909) instrument, assessing the vividness of mental imagery across visual, auditory, cutaneous, kinesthetic, gustatory, olfactory, and organic modalities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","categories":[117,128,13597,2],"tags":[13601,13600,13602,2808,13603,6,13598,13599,7215,7216],"class_list":["post-3854","psych_scale","type-psych_scale","status-publish","hentry","category-clinical-assessment","category-cognitive-psychology","category-perception-imagery","category-psychometrics","tag-auditory-imagery","tag-betts","tag-kinesthetic-imagery","tag-mental-imagery","tag-multi-sensory","tag-psychometrics","tag-qmi","tag-sheehan","tag-visual-imagery","tag-vividness"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale\/3854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/psych_scale"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/psych_scale\/3854\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ashadocs.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}2. Keywords<\/h2>\n
3. Authors<\/h2>\n
4. Purpose<\/h2>\n
5. Psychological Construct<\/h2>\n
\n
6. Theoretical Framework<\/h2>\n
7. Validity<\/h2>\n
\n
8. Reliability<\/h2>\n
\n
9. Factor Analysis<\/h2>\n
\n
10. Instrument \/ Measurement Tool<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
11. Permissions & Fee and Test Year<\/h2>\n
12. References<\/h2>\n
\n
13. Items of the Scale<\/h2>\n
\n 1<\/strong> = Perfectly clear and as vivid as the normal vision\/perception<\/span>
\n 2<\/strong> = Very clear and comparable in vividness to the actual experience<\/span>
\n 3<\/strong> = Moderately clear and vivid<\/span>
\n 4<\/strong> = Not clear or vivid, but recognizable<\/span>
\n 5<\/strong> = Vague and dim<\/span>
\n 6<\/strong> = So weak and dim as to be hardly perceptible<\/span>
\n 7<\/strong> = No image present at all, you only ‘know’ that you are thinking of the object<\/span>\n <\/div>\nVisual Imagery<\/h3>\n
\n
Auditory Imagery<\/h3>\n
\n
Cutaneous (Tactile) Imagery<\/h3>\n
\n
Kinesthetic Imagery<\/h3>\n
\n
Gustatory Imagery<\/h3>\n
\n
Olfactory Imagery<\/h3>\n
\n
Organic Imagery<\/h3>\n
\n