In high-pressure environments ranging from Olympic arenas and aviation cockpits to psychiatric clinics treating severe anxiety disorders, the capacity to voluntarily direct, sustain, and shift attentional focus constitutes a vital determinant of human performance and psychological well-being. Attentional failures under stress often precipitate performance choking, cognitive paralysis, or pervasive emotional dysregulation. Attention-control training emerges as a scientifically grounded framework engineered to systematically rehabilitate, reinforce, and optimize executive attentional networks against internal distractions and external disruptions.
Attention-Control Training (ACT)
1. Concise Definition
Attention-control training (ACT) refers to any structured, multimodal cognitive or behavioral intervention designed to strengthen an individual’s capacity for voluntary, top-down allocation of attentional resources. It aims to develop the ability to selectively focus on goal-relevant stimuli, inhibit irrelevant external distractors and intrusive internal cognitions, and flexibly shift attentional breadth and direction across changing environmental demands.
Originating concurrently within sport psychology to optimize athletic performance under high arousal and within clinical neuropsychology to remediate cognitive deficits and emotional disorders, ACT operates by systematically engaging the central executive network. Rather than serving as a passive strategy of positive thinking, ACT cultivates conscious meta-attentional regulation, empowering individuals to exert deliberate control over where, how broadly, and for how long cognitive processing resources are deployed.
2. Etymology and Linguistic Origin
The term is an English compound syntagma combining three primary lexemes derived from Classical Latin. Attention traces back to the Latin noun attentio (a stretching toward, mental application), which originates from the verb attendere, formed by prefixing ad- (toward) to tendere (to stretch, extend, or direct). The underlying metaphor captures the physical exertion of reaching or extending cognitive senses toward an object of observation.
Control stems from the Anglo-French contrerolle, rooted in the Medieval Latin contrarotulus (a counter-roll or duplicate register used to verify accounts), formed by combining contra (against, opposite) and rotulus (a roll of parchment or scroll). Over time, the meaning shifted from documentary verification to the exercise of restraint, guidance, direction, and regulatory mastery over an active process.
Training derives through Middle English from the Old French verb trahiner or trainer (to draw, drag, or haul along), which descended from Vulgar Latin *traginare, iterative of the Classical Latin trahere (to pull or draw). By the seventeenth century, the term came to signify systematic instruction, physical drill, discipline, and habituation designed to instill proficiency. The acronym ACT entered formal psychological literature in the mid-1970s, predominantly popularized by performance psychologist Robert M. Nideffer in his seminal 1976 work, The Inner Athlete: Mind Over Muscle, and further expanded across modern attentional control paradigms.
3. Pronunciation and Grammatical Form
Phonetic Transcription: /əˈtɛn.ʃən kənˈtroʊl ˈtreɪ.nɪŋ/ (US); /əˈtɛn.ʃən kənˈtrəʊl ˈtreɪ.nɪŋ/ (UK).
Grammatical Form: Compound noun phrase (uncountable). In psychological terminology, it functions as an umbrella designation for both a standardized diagnostic-therapeutic protocol and a broader class of executive-function training interventions. When used adjectivally to describe specific exercises, programs, or batteries, it typically carries a hyphen between the first two terms: attention-control training protocol, attention-control exercises, or ACT intervention.
4. Detailed Conceptual Explanation
To comprehend attention-control training, one must contrast reflexive, stimulus-driven attentional capture with deliberative, goal-driven executive regulation. Human attention is perpetually negotiated between bottom-up perceptual salience—wherein loud noises, sudden movements, or threatening internal thoughts involuntarily seize processing priority—and top-down cognitive intention, governed by goals, rules, and task representations maintained within working memory. When an individual experiences intense physiological arousal, performance pressure, or clinical anxiety, the bottom-up system tends to hyperactivate. This dynamic leads to catastrophic attentional narrowing, hypervigilance toward threat cues, or catastrophic cognitive overload.
Attention-control training intervenes directly into this computational imbalance. By providing systematic cognitive drills, biofeedback-coupled scenarios, and behavioral exercises, ACT establishes heightened meta-attentional awareness. Practitioners learn to notice the subtle drift of attentional focus away from operational targets and execute immediate corrective reorientation. The foundational hypothesis posits that attention functions analogously to a physical muscle: when subjected to progressive, targeted resistance—such as maintaining concentration amid sensory chaos or inhibiting automatic reactions to task-irrelevant triggers—the neural assemblies supporting sustained and selective attention undergo neuroplastic enhancement.
Furthermore, ACT does not advocate for a rigid, monolithic state of deep concentration. Instead, it emphasizes attentional flexibility and situational appropriateness. Effective performance in dynamic environments requires the capability to smoothly transition between broad scanning of environmental patterns and narrow, laser-like focus on an isolated visual target, as well as between external sensory tracking and internal strategic contemplation. ACT explicitly teaches individuals how to diagnose the attentional demands of an immediate task and intentionally calibrate their focus accordingly, preventing attentional bottlenecks before they trigger performance failure or affective collapse.
5. Historical Development
The genesis of structured attention-control training represents a convergence of athletic performance science, military human factors engineering, and cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy over the latter half of the twentieth century:
During the early 1970s, clinical and sports psychologist Dr. Robert M. Nideffer observed that elite athletes frequently suffered performance failures not because of physical conditioning deficits, but due to an inability to adjust their focus under acute psychological stress. In 1976, Nideffer published his dual-dimensional model of attention alongside the Test of Attentional and Interpersonal Style (TAIS). This model conceptualized attention along two orthogonal axes: Width (broad vs. narrow) and Direction (internal vs. external). Nideffer’s formal Attentional Control Training (ACT) system trained performers to diagnose their personal attentional biases, recognize physiological indicators of overarousal, and intentionally switch between attentional quadrants.
Concurrently, in cognitive neuropsychology and military aviation, researchers sought methods to mitigate vigilance decrement among radar operators and pilots. The work of Michael Posner in the late 1970s and 1980s decomposing attention into alerting, orienting, and executive networks provided a rigorous neurocognitive architecture that validated the mechanisms underlying attention-control drills.
In the 1990s, the paradigm expanded substantially into clinical psychology. British psychologist Adrian Wells formulated the Attention Training Technique (ATT) as a cornerstone of Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). Wells designed auditory attentional exercises specifically to dismantle the Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS)—a maladaptive mental state characterized by rumination, worry, fixation on threat, and perceived loss of cognitive control. Parallel developments occurred in neurorehabilitation, where Sohlberg and Mateer established the Attention Process Training (APT) model to systematically remediate focused, sustained, selective, alternating, and divided attention among patients recovering from traumatic brain injury and cerebrovascular stroke.
In the twenty-first century, the advent of computerized cognitive training platforms, functional neuroimaging, and eye-tracking technology led to the formulation of Attentional Control Theory by Michael Eysenck and colleagues (2007). Contemporary ACT integrates computerized cognitive bias modification for attention (CBM-A), neurofeedback protocols targeting frontoparietal electroencephalographic activity, and virtual reality simulations that replicate ecologically valid, high-distraction operational environments.
6. Theoretical Foundations
Attention-control training rests upon several robust theoretical frameworks across cognitive science and neuropsychology:
Nideffer’s Attentional Model: Nideffer posited that any attentional task can be mapped along two axes: breadth (broad to narrow) and direction (internal to external). A quarterback scanning an entire defensive formation utilizes a broad-external focus; analyzing playbook options uses a broad-internal focus; executing a precise throw to a single receiver requires a narrow-external focus; and regulating heart rate via diaphragmatic breathing demands a narrow-internal focus. Performance deficits occur when individuals deploy an inappropriate attentional style for a specific task demand or lack the cognitive agility to transition between quadrants when situational demands evolve.
Attentional Control Theory (ACT-Eysenck): Developed by Michael Eysenck, Judith Derakshan, Nazanin Derakhtshan, and Manuel Calvo, this theory asserts that anxiety impairs the processing efficiency of the central executive functions of working memory. Specifically, anxiety disrupts the balance between the top-down, goal-directed attentional system (located primarily in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and the bottom-up, stimulus-driven attentional system (rooted in the temporoparietal network and amygdala). ACT interventions remediate these deficits by reinforcing the three core executive functions defined by Akira Miyake and colleagues: inhibition (resisting prepotent responses), shifting (switching cognitive sets), and updating (monitoring working memory representations).
Biopsychosocial and Metacognitive Models: Adrian Wells’ metacognitive model postulates that psychological disorders persist because patients believe their perseverative thinking and attentional fixation are uncontrollable. By participating in neutral, non-evaluative attention-control training, patients develop metacognitive awareness. They discover that attentional focus is an active, voluntary choice rather than an involuntary, hardwired response to affective distress.
7. Key Components, Types, and Dimensions
Attention-control training is operationalized across multiple complementary dimensions and programmatic modalities:
- Dimensional Axes of Attention:
- Broad-External: Rapidly scanning the outer environment to absorb multiple information streams simultaneously (e.g., navigating heavy traffic, fast-break basketball defense).
- Broad-Internal: Integrating internal memories, tactical strategies, theoretical models, and diagnostic concepts (e.g., medical differential diagnosis, game-planning).
- Narrow-External: Intense visual or auditory focus locked onto one or two external targets while gating out peripheral data (e.g., threading a needle, watching a pitched baseball).
- Narrow-Internal: Focusing attention inward on a discrete bodily sensation, kinesthetic cue, mental rehearsal image, or single physiological parameter (e.g., tracking breath mechanics during meditation).
- Functional Executive Subtypes:
- Selective Attention Training: Drills requiring the extraction of target signals embedded in dense, conflicting distractor arrays (e.g., flanker tasks, Stroop paradigms).
- Sustained Attention / Vigilance Training: Tasks demanding unbroken perceptual monitoring over extended durations to detect rare, low-salience events without vigilance decrement.
- Alternating and Shifting Attention Training: Exercises enforcing rapid, fluid switching of behavioral rules and focus between disparate stimulus sets (task-switching).
- Divided Attention Training: Complex operational training requiring dual-task management and concurrent processing across divergent sensory channels without catastrophic performance cross-talk.
- Delivery Modalities:
- Metacognitive-Auditory Drills (Wells’ ATT): Structured listening tasks that train selective auditory focus, rapid sound-to-sound shifting, and divided multi-sound processing.
- Computerized Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM-A): Algorithmic reaction-time paradigms designed to systematically recondition involuntary threat-monitoring tendencies.
- Biofeedback and Neurofeedback ACT: Sensor-integrated protocols using EEG, heart-rate variability (HRV), or eye-tracking to provide real-time reinforcement for maintaining optimal neurocognitive attentional states.
- In Situ Simulation Training: High-fidelity real-world or virtual-reality exposure featuring escalating sensory noise, stressors, and unpredictable task interruptions.
8. Examples and Illustrative Cases
To appreciate how attention-control training operates across disparate disciplines, consider the following real-world scenarios:
Case 1: The Elite Biathlete under Pressure
An elite winter biathlete consistently shoots accurately during training but suffers debilitating performance lapses at major international competitions. Upon entering the shooting range following an intense cross-country ski sprint, heart rate spikes to 175 beats per minute. Heightened autonomic arousal triggers catastrophic broad-internal attention: catastrophic worry regarding media scrutiny and medal standings. Through attention-control training, the biathlete learns systematic somatic quieting coupled with an immediate attentional protocol. The athlete is trained to consciously bypass broad-internal rumination, execute a momentary narrow-internal check on trigger finger kinesthetics and diaphragm release, and instantly shift to an uncompromising narrow-external lock on the target bullseye. By automating this attentional sequence, target accuracy is maintained regardless of physiological arousal.
Case 2: Remediating Severe Social Anxiety Disorder
A corporate executive struggles with severe social anxiety, experiencing debilitating physiological freezing during board presentations. The executive’s attentional system automatically locks into an acute internal threat-monitoring loop (noticing throat dryness, heart palpitations, and anticipating professional failure). The clinician implements Wells’ Attention Training Technique. For four weeks, the client completes daily auditory attention exercises involving simultaneous competing sounds (a ticking clock, traffic noise, distant voices, running water). The executive practices selectively attending to one faint sound, systematically switching attention on command, and expanding attention to perceive all auditory inputs simultaneously. Crucially, the sounds carry no emotional relevance. The client discovers that attention can be detached from internal bodily threats and redirected deliberately outward toward the presentation slides and audience engagement.
9. Measurement and Assessment
Assessing the baseline capacity and post-intervention efficacy of attention-control training requires a multifaceted diagnostic framework spanning psychometric self-reports, computerized neuropsychological batteries, and neurofunctional biomarkers:
Psychometric Inventories: The foundational clinical and performance instrument remains Nideffer’s Test of Attentional and Interpersonal Style (TAIS), a 144-item standardized self-report inventory that quantifies effective attentional deployment (Broad-External [BET], Broad-Internal [BIT], Narrow-Effective Focus [NAR]) alongside specific attentional vulnerabilities (External Overload [OET], Internal Overload [OIT], and Reduced Attention [RED]). In clinical psychology, researchers frequently deploy Derryberry and Reed’s Attentional Control Scale (ACS), which explicitly evaluates self-perceived capacities for attentional focusing and attentional shifting under emotional duress.
Computerized Neuropsychological Testing: Objective assessment of executive attention is routinely measured through validated reaction-time and accuracy paradigms. The Attention Network Test (ANT), developed by Fan and Posner, allows independent quantification of alerting, orienting, and executive control network efficiencies by combining cued reaction-time tasks with flanker interference. The Continuous Performance Task (CPT) evaluates sustained attention and response inhibition over extended durations. Additional standard batteries include the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) for cognitive shifting, the Stroop Color-Word Task for inhibitory control, and computerized dual-task paradigms to assess divided attentional overhead.
Physiological and Neuroimaging Biomarkers: High-resolution eye-tracking systems capture gaze-fixation stability, latency of pro-saccades versus anti-saccades, and pupillometric variations reflecting cognitive effort during attentional engagement. Electroencephalography (EEG) measures the suppression of frontal theta rhythms and the enhancement of sensorimotor rhythm (SMR) or upper alpha coherence, serving as functional indices of concentrated attentional gating. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) reveals increased blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activation within the frontoparietal control network (FPN) and down-regulated activity in the default mode network (DMN), reflecting effective suppression of task-irrelevant mind-wandering.
10. Applications and Practical Significance
The applications of attention-control training span a wide variety of high-stakes human performance and therapeutic domains:
Aviation and Military Operations: Combat aviators, air traffic controllers, and special operations personnel operate within high-stress data environments characterized by extreme sensory overload and immediate physical peril. In these settings, attention-control training builds cognitive resilience. Pilots trained in attention management exhibit superior instrument cross-check scanning, faster detection of anomalous telemetry, and resistance to attentional tunneling during catastrophic in-flight emergencies.
High-Performance Athletics: Elite athletic organizations routinely integrate ACT into sport psychology protocols. From motor-racing drivers managing high cognitive workloads at extreme velocities to tennis players maintaining composure between high-stakes points, ACT provides athletes with concrete tools to regulate arousal, eliminate crowd distraction, and systematically match their attentional breadth to sport-specific requirements.
Clinical Psychiatry and Psychotherapy: Within mental health, ACT serves as a transdiagnostic intervention. Chronic anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and major depressive disorder share a core pathology: the hijacking of attentional resources by intrusive, threat-laden, or depressive internal cognitions. Incorporating attention training into cognitive-behavioral and metacognitive frameworks remediates these conditions by dismantling threat hypervigilance and ruminative thought spirals, giving patients the cognitive capacity to disengage from distressing thoughts.
Neurodevelopmental and Educational Contexts: For children and adults diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), ACT provides a non-pharmacological, neuroplastic intervention to develop focused concentration, working memory retention, and behavioral impulse inhibition. In general educational settings, attentional training exercises enhance deep reading comprehension, academic stamina, and resistance to ubiquitous digital media distractions.
11. Research and Empirical Evidence
Decades of empirical investigations provide strong support for the neural plasticity and operational efficacy of attention-control interventions:
In clinical trials, Adrian Wells and colleagues have repeatedly demonstrated the efficacy of the Attention Training Technique (ATT) across anxiety disorders. Meta-analyses by Fergus and Bardeen examining ATT outcomes revealed significant reductions in anxiety, depressive symptoms, and intrusive thoughts, accompanied by marked decreases in self-reported cognitive attentional syndrome activity. Notably, functional imaging trials indicate that clinical improvements achieved via attention training correlate with decreased amygdaloid hyperreactivity and strengthened functional connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and limbic processing structures.
Within the cognitive domain, Michael Posner, Mary Rothbart, and colleagues proved that targeted executive attention training in both children and adults induces observable changes in electrophysiological brain states. Their research revealed improvements in conflict resolution tasks and enhanced efficiency within the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Related work on cognitive bias modification for attention (CBM-A) by Colin MacLeod and Andrew Mathews established that experimentally training attentional disengagement away from threat-related stimuli reduces emotional vulnerability to subsequent laboratory and real-world stressors.
In sports and performance psychology, research utilizing eye-tracking technology has linked successful attention-control training to the phenomenon known as the “quiet eye”—a prolonged, stable final visual fixation on a critical target prior to motor execution (e.g., a golf putt, basketball free-throw, or surgical incision). Studies by Joan Vickers and Mark Wilson demonstrated that athletes instructed in attentional control regimens exhibit prolonged quiet-eye durations under pressure, which directly prevents performance choking and maintains fine motor coordination despite elevated autonomic arousal.
12. Cultural and Cross-Cultural Considerations
The conceptualization, implementation, and reception of attention-control training vary across diverse cultural and social landscapes:
Western paradigms of attention-control training historically developed within a framework emphasizing individualist task execution, analytical deconstruction, and linear objective achievement. The primary focus centers on isolating the individual agent, optimizing personal processing throughput, and suppressing distracting stimuli to hit explicit operational targets.
Conversely, many Eastern intellectual and contemplative traditions—most visibly exemplified by Buddhist Vipassana and Samatha meditation, Hindu Raja Yoga, and Taoist internal martial arts—have cultivated sophisticated attention-control technologies over millennia. However, these systems conceptualize attention differently. Rather than viewing attention merely as a mechanical, competitive tool for technical execution, contemplative attention practices emphasize panoramic, non-judgmental awareness, ego-decentering, and harmonious integration with the broader environment. Modern Western clinical adaptations, including Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) developed by Jon Kabat-Zinn, represent an empirical synthesis of these traditions with Western neuropsychology.
Cross-cultural cognitive research conducted by Richard Nisbett and colleagues underscores that cultural background influences baseline perceptual processing styles. Western participants frequently exhibit an analytical attentional bias (focussing narrowly on focal objects independent of background context), whereas East Asian participants routinely demonstrate a holistic attentional bias (attending broadly to environmental relationships, field background, and contextual cues). Consequently, standardized attention-control training protocols must account for these cultural baselines; an analytic bias may necessitate extra training in broad-external scanning, while a holistic bias may require targeted practice in narrow-external visual isolation.
13. Criticisms, Debates, and Limitations
Despite its extensive theoretical appeal and empirical support, attention-control training remains the subject of ongoing scientific debates and methodological critiques:
The Transferability and Generalization Problem: The most significant critique leveled against computerized attention training—shared with the broader brain-training literature—concerns the transfer of training. Critics, including cognitive psychologists David Green and Thomas Bavelier, have noted that while participants readily demonstrate substantial performance gains on the trained attention task itself (near transfer), evidence demonstrating robust, durable generalization to untrained everyday tasks, academic achievement, or broader cognitive vitality (far transfer) remains inconsistent. Critics argue that computerized training frequently produces task-specific skill acquisition rather than a global enhancement of general executive function.
Methodological Heterogeneity: Meta-analytic investigations of Attention Training Technique (ATT) and Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) have uncovered high methodological variability among clinical trials. Small sample sizes, inconsistent control conditions (active versus passive controls), and variability in training dosages create challenges in estimating true effect sizes. Furthermore, several high-profile clinical replications have suggested that the therapeutic benefits of CBM-A may be more modest and variable than early trials initially claimed.
Over-Simplification of Complex Performance: In competitive sports and tactical domains, some motor learning theorists argue that an excessive focus on internal or cognitive attentional mechanics can paradoxically disrupt fluid, automated motor performance. Proponents of ecological dynamics and nonlinear pedagogy suggest that human movement is best optimized through self-organizing environmental affordances rather than explicit, top-down cognitive control over attention.
14. Related Terms and Distinctions
To avoid conceptual conflation, attention-control training must be differentiated from closely allied cognitive constructs and therapeutic modalities:
- Attention-Control Training (ACT) vs. Mindfulness / Meditation: While both paradigms engage attentional mechanisms, ACT typically utilizes structured, active cognitive and sensory drills (often externally oriented, task-specific, or compensatory) aimed at optimizing operational performance or restructuring metacognitive beliefs. Mindfulness emphasizes non-reactive, non-judgmental acceptance of immediate internal and external experiences without an explicit requirement to alter attentional breadth to meet technical task demands.
- Attention-Control Training (ACT) vs. Working Memory Training: Working memory training focuses primarily on expanding the capacity to hold, update, and manipulate information over brief delay periods (e.g., dual n-back tasks). ACT focuses specifically on the directional allocation, breadth calibration, and distractor-inhibition parameters that govern which perceptual streams enter working memory in the first place.
- Attention-Control Training (ACT) vs. Cognitive Bias Modification for Attention (CBM-A): CBM-A represents a specific, computerized subtype of attention training designed exclusively to alter automatic, pre-attentive biases toward threat or rewarding stimuli via repetitive probe tasks. ACT encompasses a much broader, multimodal therapeutic and performance architecture that includes conscious diagnostic models, metacognitive techniques, and somatic integration.
- Attention-Control Training (ACT) vs. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT): Although sharing the identical acronym “ACT,” Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (pronounced as the single word “act”) is a comprehensive contextual behavioral psychotherapy developed by Steven C. Hayes. It focuses on psychological flexibility, cognitive defusion, and values-based behavioral action, whereas Attention-Control Training is an empirical cognitive-behavioral training protocol focused on the executive regulation of attention.
15. Summary and Key Takeaways
Attention-control training represents an empirical, multimodal discipline dedicated to strengthening human executive functioning, distractor resistance, and attentional agility. Synthesizing early foundations from Robert Nideffer’s sport performance matrices with modern cognitive neuroscientific models, ACT provides a systematic methodology for identifying cognitive biases, regulating physiological overarousal, and voluntarily adjusting attentional breadth and direction across complex environments.
Whether implemented as auditory drills to dissolve perseverative psychiatric rumination, eye-tracking protocols to instill steady gaze control in tactical athletes, or computerized exercises to resolve cognitive interference, ACT targets the underlying frontoparietal networks that direct cognitive focus. While ongoing scientific debates scrutinize the extent of far-transfer cognitive generalization, the disciplined application of attention-control training remains a foundational pillar across modern performance enhancement, neurocognitive rehabilitation, and evidence-based clinical psychology.
References
- Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theory. Emotion, 7(2), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336
- Fergus, T. A., & Bardeen, J. R. (2016). The Attention Training Technique: A review of theoretical underpinnings and empirical support. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30(4), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.30.4.260
- Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
- Nideffer, R. M. (1976). Test of attentional and interpersonal style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.394
- Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
- Vickers, J. N. (2007). Perception, cognition, and decision training: The quiet eye in action. Human Kinetics.
- Wells, A. (1990). Panic disorder in association with relaxation induced anxiety: An attentional training approach to treatment. Behavior Therapy, 21(3), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80330-2