Human and animal survival hinges on the capacity to prepare for environmental challenges before they manifest physically. Rather than operating purely as reactive biological organisms waiting for external inputs, living systems continuously forecast future states and mobilize physiological, behavioral, and neural resources in advance.
Anticipatory Response
1. Concise Definition
An anticipatory response is a physiological, behavioral, or neural change that occurs in an organism prior to the onset of an expected stimulus, event, or environmental demand. It represents an adaptive feedforward mechanism designed to optimize performance, preserve homeostasis, or mitigate potential disruption.
In psychological and neurobiological literature, an anticipatory response is distinguished by its temporal occurrence: it is initiated not by the primary stimulus itself, but by predictive cues, internal temporal estimations, or cognitive expectancies. These responses span diverse domains, encompassing autonomic adaptations such as the cephalic phase of digestion, motor preparation characterized by readiness potentials in the motor cortex, and neuroendocrine surges of cortisol prior to anticipated physical or psychological stressors.
Fundamentally, the anticipatory response illustrates that organisms do not merely exist in a state of passive equilibrium governed exclusively by reactive feedback loops. Instead, biological systems proactively alter their internal milieu through predictive regulation, ensuring that the energetic, psychological, and biomechanical costs of impending environmental interactions are distributed advantageously over time.
2. Etymology & Linguistic Origin
The term derives from the Latin verb anticipare, which is a compound of ante (meaning “before”) and capere (meaning “to take” or “to seize”). Literally translating to “taking beforehand” or “acting in advance,” the classical root reflects an active capture of an outcome before it physically arrives. The word entered Middle English via Old French in the late Middle Ages, initially denoting the act of taking up an idea or paying a debt before the appointed time.
The companion term response traces its lineage to the Latin respondere, formed from re- (“again” or “back”) and spondere (“to pledge” or “to promise”). By the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, as experimental physiology and behaviorism emerged as formal disciplines, these classical linguistic elements were merged into specialized psychological nomenclature. Early experimentalists such as Ivan Pavlov, though writing primarily in Russian (using terms such as preduprezhdayushchaya reaktsiya), established the conceptual groundwork that Western physiologists and behaviorists subsequently standardized in English as the “anticipatory response” or “conditioned preparatory response.”
3. Pronunciation & Grammatical Form
The term is pronounced phonetically in standard American English as /ænˌtɪs.ə.pəˈtɔːr.i rɪˈspɒns/ and in British English as /ænˌtɪs.ɪˈpeɪ.tər.i rɪˈspɒns/. Morphologically, it functions as a compound noun phrase consisting of the adjective anticipatory (modifying the temporal nature of the action) and the noun response (the target physiological or psychological phenomenon).
The grammatical plural form is anticipatory responses. In specialized psychophysiological contexts, the term is frequently employed as an attributive noun adjunct, as observed in phrases such as “anticipatory response latency,” “anticipatory response amplitude,” and “anticipatory response profiling.” It is syntactically distinct from related constructs like “anticipation” (an overarching cognitive state) and “anticipatory behavior” (overt, observable motor actions), preserving its utility as a broad descriptor encompassing both covert autonomic shifts and overt behavioral adjustments.
4. Detailed Conceptual Explanation
To grasp the conceptual scope of the anticipatory response, one must contrast feedforward control with reactive feedback regulation. In classic homeostatic models, deviations from a baseline physiological set point trigger negative feedback loops that correct the disturbance after it has occurred. For example, when core body temperature falls, shivering is initiated to generate heat. While functional, reactive feedback inevitably incurs a temporal delay, during which internal stability is compromised. An anticipatory response bypasses this vulnerability by initiating physiological adjustments before the disturbance takes place, relying on predictive environmental regularities.
At the central nervous system level, anticipatory responding represents the active minimization of surprise. According to computational neuroscience, the brain functions as a prediction machine that generates internal models of the world. Sensory signals are not passively processed from the bottom up; rather, top-down predictions descending from the prefrontal cortex, insular cortex, and basal ganglia continuously meet incoming sensory afferents. When an impending event is predicted with high confidence, motor circuits, autonomic nuclei, and endocrine axes are preemptively engaged to match the predicted metabolic requirements.
The scope of anticipatory responses extends across multiple distinct physiological and psychological domains:
In metabolic physiology, anticipatory responses prevent dramatic biochemical swings. When a person observes, smells, or even consciously contemplates food, the nervous system triggers cephalic phase responses, including salivary secretion, gastric acid release, and an early surge of pancreatic insulin. This anticipatory insulin secretion prevents dangerous postprandial hyperglycemia by clearing the bloodstream before large glucose loads are absorbed through the intestinal wall.
In biomechanics and motor neuroscience, anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) ensure postural equilibrium. When an individual prepares to lift a heavy object, electromyographic recordings reveal that the musculature of the calves, thighs, and abdominal wall activates milliseconds before the arm muscles initiate the pull. Without this anticipatory stabilization, the center of mass would shift precipitously, causing the individual to lose balance.
In the domain of affect and stress regulation, anticipatory responding governs psychological resilience and vulnerability. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis frequently exhibits an anticipatory elevation in glucocorticoid secretion prior to public speaking, competitive athletics, or cognitive evaluations. When calibrated properly, this anticipatory arousal sharpens focus, accelerates cognitive processing, and primes muscle tissue with energetic substrates. However, when anticipatory responses become chronic, exaggerated, or disconnected from actual environmental contingencies, they crystallize into debilitating states of anticipatory anxiety, panic disorders, and sustained systemic inflammation.
5. Historical Development
The scientific conceptualization of anticipatory responses emerged directly from early twentieth-century inquiries into classical conditioning. Ivan Pavlov observed that experimental canines began salivating not merely when food touched their lingual papillae, but when they heard the footsteps of the laboratory technician or the sound of an associated metronome. While initial interpretations categorized this conditioned reflex as a mechanical association between two stimuli, Pavlov recognized its biological utility as an anticipatory adaptation that prepared the gastrointestinal system for efficient digestion.
During the mid-twentieth century, behaviorists such as Clark Hull and Kenneth Spence incorporated anticipatory constructs into formal learning theories. Hull posited the existence of the “fractional anticipatory goal response” (symbolized as rg-sg), suggesting that internal, microscopic fragments of the ultimate reward response occur early in a behavioral chain, serving as internal incentive motivators that pull an organism toward a goal. This theoretical bridge allowed behaviorism to account for goal-directed, forward-looking behavior without invoking mentalistic teleology.
In the 1960s, the electrophysiological identification of anticipatory neural activity advanced considerably. In 1964, W. Grey Walter and colleagues discovered the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV), an event-related slow negative brain potential that develops between a warning stimulus and an imperative stimulus requiring a motor response. Shortly thereafter, in 1965, Hans Helmut Kornhuber and Lüder Deecke identified the Bereitschaftspotential (readiness potential), an electroencephalographic wave detectable hundreds of milliseconds prior to voluntary motor execution. These discoveries offered objective proof that the human cerebral cortex generates measurable neuroelectric preparations well before actions occur.
By the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, the framework shifted from isolated reflexes to integrated systemic biology. Peter Sterling and Joseph Eyer introduced the concept of allostasis in 1988, which Bruce McEwen later popularized. Allostasis established that physiological regulation aims not at maintaining a static internal constancy (homeostasis), but at achieving stability through change—a process driven almost entirely by anticipatory brain mechanisms that predict metabolic needs based on past experience and future demands.
6. Theoretical Foundations
The contemporary understanding of the anticipatory response rests upon four primary theoretical pillars: classical conditioning, cybernetic feedforward theory, the allostasis model, and predictive processing.
From the perspective of Classical Conditioning and Associative Learning, the anticipatory response is frequently conceptualized as a conditioned response (CR) designed to prepare for an unconditioned stimulus (US). Notably, Shepard Siegel expanded this view through the Compensatory Response Model, showing that anticipatory conditioned responses are often opposite in direction to the direct drug effect. For instance, environmental cues consistently paired with morphine administration provoke an anticipatory increase in pain sensitivity and hyperalgesia, effectively counteracting the impending drug-induced analgesia and generating physiological tolerance.
The Cybernetic and Control Theory Framework conceptualizes anticipatory responses through feedforward control algorithms. In classic feedback systems, an error detector calculates the variance between the set point and the measured variable, initiating a corrective signal only after an error occurs. In contrast, feedforward architectures use a predictive model of the environment to measure incoming disturbances directly. By calculating the expected perturbation, the controller adjusts the system parameters in advance, eliminating the transient performance errors inherent to reactive loops.
The Allostatic Framework, developed by Sterling and McEwen, repositions the brain as the central coordinator of physiological regulation. Homeostasis posits that local organs govern themselves via isolated set points. Allostasis argues that the brain coordinates whole-organism physiology by forecasting environmental requirements and preemptively altering blood pressure, glucose mobilization, and immune function. The anticipatory response is the fundamental mechanism through which allostasis operates, ensuring that physiological parameters shift in anticipation of behavioral states rather than responding purely after somatic exhaustion or injury.
Finally, the Predictive Processing Framework and Active Inference, championed by neuroscientists such as Karl Friston, asserts that biological intelligence is driven by the imperative to minimize prediction errors. Under this model, the brain maintains a hierarchical generative model of its sensory inputs and somatic states. To resolve discrepancies between internal predictions and external signals, organisms can either update their internal beliefs or take physical actions to bring sensory states into alignment with their predictions. An anticipatory response is an instantiation of active inference, wherein the organism proactively changes its autonomic tone or motor posture to make its physical reality conform to its prior predictive models.
7. Key Components, Types & Dimensions
Anticipatory responses are multidimensional and manifest across several physiological, neurobiological, and behavioral domains:
- Autonomic Anticipatory Responses: Involuntary modifications mediated by the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system. Examples include the cephalic phase of digestion, pre-exercise tachycardia (anticipatory elevation of heart rate prior to physical exertion), and anticipatory electrodermal activity (galvanic skin conductance surges prior to high-risk decisions).
- Neuroendocrine Anticipatory Responses: Hormonal shifts driven by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and sympathoadrenomedullary (SAM) axes. A prominent example is the Cortisol Awakening Response (CAR), an abrupt increase in circulating cortisol occurring 30 to 45 minutes post-awakening that prepares the brain and body for anticipated daily metabolic demands.
- Electrophysiological and Cortical Markers: Distinct neural signals captured via electroencephalography (EEG) that reflect cognitive and motor preparation. These include the Contingent Negative Variation (CNV), the Bereitschaftspotential (readiness potential), and the Stimulus-Preceding Negativity (SPN), which reflects emotional and motivational anticipation of feedback.
- Anticipatory Postural Adjustments (APAs): Involuntary, feedforward activations of postural and trunk stabilizing musculature that occur prior to focal voluntary movements, preventing destabilization of the body’s center of mass.
- Cognitive and Affective Anticipatory Responses: Psychological states characterized by expectancy, vigilance, or worry. While adaptive anticipation sharpens selective attention and perceptual acuity toward expected cues, maladaptive cognitive anticipation leads to chronic catastrophizing and hyperarousal.
- Neurochemical Reward Anticipation: Phasic firing patterns of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra. As demonstrated in behavioral neurobiology, dopamine neurons transition from firing upon reward delivery to firing upon the presentation of the predictive cue, encoding an anticipatory prediction of future reward.
8. Examples & Illustrative Cases
The ubiquity of anticipatory responses is best illustrated through distinct real-world contexts and case studies spanning sports, pharmacology, clinical pathology, and daily human physiology.
Case 1: The Elite Sprinter on the Starting Blocks. Consider an elite track athlete crouched in the starting blocks awaiting the starter’s pistol. Long before the acoustic stimulus sounds, the athlete’s heart rate climbs significantly above resting baseline, systemic vascular resistance redistributes blood flow away from the viscera toward skeletal muscle, and circulating adrenaline rises. This anticipatory cardiovascular response is generated by central command—a feedforward descending signal from the motor cortex and hypothalamus to autonomic nuclei. Without this anticipatory acceleration of cardiac output, the sprinter would experience transient oxygen debt and muscle ischemia during the initial meters of the race.
Case 2: Pavlovian Conditioning and Drug Overdose. A well-documented phenomenon in psychopharmacology involves environmental specificity in drug tolerance. An individual with severe opioid dependence routinely injects heroin in a specific room accompanied by distinct sensory paraphernalia. Over repeated administrations, these environmental cues elicit an intense anticipatory compensatory response: the nervous system preemptively elevates body temperature, increases pain sensitivity, and upregulates respiration to counteract the depressant effects of the drug. If the individual injects their typical high dose in a completely novel environment devoid of these predictive cues, the anticipatory compensatory response fails to deploy. Consequently, the unmitigated pharmacodynamic impact of the drug can trigger fatal respiratory depression, explaining overdoses occurring without an increase in dosage.
Case 3: Anticipatory Nausea in Oncology. Patients undergoing systemic cancer chemotherapy often develop severe conditioned anticipatory nausea. After several infusions where toxic chemotherapeutic agents (unconditioned stimulus) induce emesis and malaise (unconditioned response), the sights, odors, and sounds of the oncology clinic become conditioned stimuli. Eventually, the patient begins vomiting or experiencing debilitating nausea in the waiting room or even while driving to the medical facility, prior to the chemical administration of any pharmacological agent. This distressing anticipatory response underscores the strength of subconscious visceral conditioning.
9. Measurement & Assessment
Quantifying anticipatory responses requires high-temporal-resolution recording methodologies capable of capturing physiological and neural dynamics before target stimuli occur.
In electrophysiology, Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) measured through electroencephalography are the gold standard for tracking cognitive and motor preparation. The Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) is assessed using a paired-stimulus paradigm: a warning stimulus (S1) is followed several seconds later by an imperative stimulus (S2) requiring a motor response. The slow negative deflection recorded at the vertex between S1 and S2 provides a precise index of expectancy and motor readiness. Similarly, the Stimulus-Preceding Negativity (SPN) measures the negative voltage that emerges prior to the presentation of an outcome, serving as an index of emotional reward anticipation.
Autonomic measures rely extensively on Electrodermal Activity (EDA) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV). Electrodermal anticipatory responses are measured by tracking skin conductance responses (SCR) that emerge during the window between a predictive cue and an impending stimulus. In the Iowa Gambling Task, for instance, healthy participants develop anticipatory SCRs prior to selecting cards from disadvantageous decks before they can articulate the explicit rule, indicating an implicit somatic anticipatory marker. Cardiovascular anticipatory responses are evaluated by tracking changes in root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) or high-frequency (HF) power in HRV, reflecting parasympathetic withdrawal prior to stressors.
In neuroimaging, the Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task, developed by Brian Knutson and colleagues, is widely used in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies. The paradigm isolates neural activity during the anticipatory phase (the interval between a cue indicating a potential monetary gain or loss and the motor target) from the consumption phase (feedback delivery). This method reliably reveals the localized blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) activation within the ventral striatum and anterior insula during reward anticipation.
In endocrinology, anticipatory responses are assessed by serial biosampling of saliva, plasma, or interstitial fluid. The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) frequently measures salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase at baseline, immediately following a ten-minute anticipatory preparation period (before speaking), and throughout subsequent recovery, isolating anticipatory stress reactivity from the stress of the actual presentation.
10. Applications & Practical Significance
The study of anticipatory responses informs clinical practice, sports performance, occupational safety, and ergonomic interface design.
In Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry, dysregulated anticipatory responses serve as fundamental transdiagnostic markers. Individuals suffering from Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) and panic disorder display pronounced physiological hyperarousal and prefrontal hypoactivation during periods of anticipation for uncertain negative events. Exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT) work partly by attenuating hyperactive anticipatory fear networks, helping patients cultivate distress tolerance while disconfirming catastrophic expectations.
In Sports Psychology and Athletics, elite motor performance depends on optimizing anticipatory reaction times. In sports such as tennis, baseball, or fencing, human reaction times are too slow to allow athletes to track a ball or blade reactively. Instead, expert performers display superior visual search strategies that read an opponent’s subtle preparatory kinematics (e.g., hip rotation, shoulder angle), initiating an anticipatory motor response before the ball is even struck. Training protocols now employ occlusion training and virtual reality to accelerate this anticipatory expertise.
In Ergonomics and Human Factors Engineering, understanding human anticipatory limitations is critical for developing safety systems. In semi-autonomous vehicles, the transition of control from automated driving back to the human driver during an emergency requires sufficient anticipatory lead time. Warning systems must supply multimodal cues that evoke pre-attentive anticipatory responses without inducing sensory overload or panic, thereby ensuring appropriate steering or braking adjustments.
In Metabolic Medicine and Nutrition, understanding the cephalic phase anticipatory response has opened new paths for treating obesity and diabetes. Ingestion of artificial non-nutritive sweeteners can trigger cephalic anticipatory insulin releases without an accompanying caloric payload, potentially distorting metabolic signaling, altering appetite regulation, and shifting downstream glycemic control over time.
11. Research & Empirical Evidence
Empirical investigation into anticipatory responses has yielded profound insights into brain function, learning mechanisms, and clinical vulnerability.
In a series of landmark neurophysiological studies, Wolfram Schultz and colleagues examined the firing patterns of midbrain dopamine neurons in non-human primates. Initially, when an unexpected liquid reward was delivered, dopaminergic neurons exhibited an unconditioned burst of activity. However, when the reward was systematically preceded by an auditory or visual conditioned stimulus, a dramatic computational shift occurred: the dopamine neurons ceased firing upon reward receipt and instead fired selectively to the predictive cue. This showed that dopamine does not signal pleasure directly; rather, it computes a temporal difference reward prediction error, serving as a neural substrate for reward anticipation.
In clinical neuroscience, work by Christian Büchel and colleagues utilized functional neuroimaging during fear conditioning to map the neural architecture underlying anticipatory pain. When human subjects were presented with visual cues signaling an impending painful cutaneous laser shock, researchers observed robust activation across the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insular cortex, and periaqueductal gray (PAG) during the anticipatory anticipation window. This confirmed that the central processing of anticipation shares substantial neuroanatomical overlap with the actual subjective experience of physical pain.
Research conducted by Bruce McEwen and colleagues documented the cumulative physiological costs of chronic anticipatory stress, a state termed allostatic load. In long-term studies, McEwen demonstrated that sustained anticipatory activation of the HPA axis—wherein individuals constantly maintain an elevated internal defense state anticipating threats that never materialize—leads to structural remodeling of the brain. Chronic anticipatory glucocorticoid exposure induces dendritic atrophy and spine loss in the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex, accompanied by dendritic hypertrophy in the basolateral amygdala, reinforcing an unrelenting cycle of hyper-reactive anticipatory anxiety.
12. Cultural & Cross-Cultural Considerations
While the basic neurobiological machinery underlying anticipatory responses is universal across human populations, the triggers, cognitive appraisals, and behavioral manifestations of anticipation are deeply shaped by cultural context.
Cross-cultural psychology demonstrates that cultural orientations toward time—specifically the distinction between monochronic and polychronic cultures—influence anticipatory cognitive styles. In monochronic societies (such as Germany, Switzerland, and the United States), time is conceptualized as linear, compartmentalized, and scarce. Individuals socialized in these environments frequently exhibit heightened anticipatory vigilance regarding punctuality, deadlines, and future schedules, driving elevated anticipatory stress responses when prospective schedules are disrupted. Conversely, in polychronic cultures (common across Latin America, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East), where time is viewed relationally and flexibly, anticipatory psychophysiological reactivity to scheduling uncertainties is demonstrably lower.
Cultural display rules also govern how anticipatory emotional responses are regulated and expressed externally. In East Asian cultural contexts that emphasize emotional restraint and dialectical thinking, individuals often demonstrate lower overt expressive behavior during the anticipation of stressful events compared to Western counterparts, despite showing comparable internal autonomic activations. Furthermore, what constitutes a threat capable of triggering an anticipatory response differs culturally: in cultures with high collectivism, cues signaling impending social rejection or public disharmony evoke significantly stronger anticipatory electrodermal and cardiovascular reactions than cues signaling personal financial or individual performance failure.
13. Criticisms, Debates & Limitations
Despite widespread acceptance, the construct of the anticipatory response remains subject to theoretical debates and methodological challenges.
One enduring theoretical dispute centers on whether anticipatory responses should be interpreted as true prospective representations or merely as sophisticated retrospective associations. Traditional radical behaviorists maintained that an animal salivating to a tone is not “anticipating” food in a cognitive sense; it is simply executing an elicited associative reflex formed through past temporal contiguity. While modern cognitive neuroscience and predictive processing models largely support the existence of forward-looking generative models, debates persist regarding the degree of cognitive representational complexity required to designate a physiological shift as genuinely “anticipatory.”
Methodologically, isolating an anticipatory response from the baseline state on one end and the consumption/target response on the other presents persistent empirical hurdles. In electroencephalography and autonomic recordings, artifacts caused by micro-movements, eye blinks, or subtle respirations can mimic or obscure slow anticipatory potentials such as the Contingent Negative Variation. In functional MRI, the low temporal resolution of the hemodynamic response function (HRF), which typically peaks several seconds after neural activation, makes it challenging to cleanly separate the neural correlates of brief anticipation from the immediate neural response to the subsequent stimulus.
Another critique focuses on the ambiguity of the functional utility of anticipatory responses in modern contexts. While allostatic feedforward mechanisms evolved to manage acute physical challenges (such as running from a predator or coping with cold exposure), modern humans frequently activate these ancient physiological pathways in response to abstract, temporally distant, or purely symbolic threats (such as long-term financial insecurity or career advancement concerns). In these scenarios, the sustained mobilization of glucose, elevated blood pressure, and cortisol secretion serves no functional mechanical purpose, transforming an evolutionarily adaptive anticipatory response into a direct etiology for cardiovascular pathology, metabolic syndrome, and autoimmune degradation.
14. Related Terms & Distinctions
To avoid conceptual ambiguity, the anticipatory response must be carefully distinguished from several closely related physiological and psychological constructs:
- Anticipatory Response vs. Conditioned Response (CR): While all anticipatory responses elicited by paired environmental cues are conditioned responses, the reverse is not true. A conditioned response can be a direct mimic of the unconditioned response or a compensatory reaction; the term anticipatory response specifically denotes the temporal, forward-looking orientation of the behavior aimed at preparing for the impending stimulus.
- Anticipatory Response vs. Feedback Response: A feedback response occurs strictly after an environmental perturbation has disrupted homeostatic balance, relying on error signals to restore equilibrium. An anticipatory response operates via feedforward control, altering physiological set points prior to the perturbation to prevent or mitigate equilibrium disruption.
- Anticipatory Response vs. Anticipatory Anxiety: Anticipatory anxiety is a specific psychiatric and emotional state characterized by persistent apprehension, catastrophic thinking, and autonomic distress concerning future uncertainties. The anticipatory response is a much broader neurobiological and behavioral category that encompasses non-emotional, highly adaptive physiological processes such as digestive salivation, motor readiness, and postural stabilization.
- Anticipatory Response vs. Expectancy: Expectancy is a conscious or subconscious cognitive representation regarding the probability of future events. An anticipatory response is the concrete physiological, autonomic, or behavioral change that occurs as a consequence of that expectancy.
15. Summary / Key Takeaways
The anticipatory response is a biological imperative that enables organisms to transition from purely reactive entities to proactive, predictive agents. By initiating autonomic, neuroendocrine, electrophysiological, and motor modifications in advance of environmental demands, living systems preserve stability, maximize performance, and minimize metabolic strain.
While essential for evolutionary survival, sports performance, and motor coordination, anticipatory responses can become maladaptive when triggered chronically by abstract psychological threats. Future research at the intersection of predictive coding, computational neuroscience, and clinical psychiatry continues to clarify how the brain constructs these forward-looking states and how dysregulated anticipatory circuits can be effectively recalibrated.
References
- Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787
- Knutson, B., Westdorp, A., Kaiser, E., & Hommer, D. (2000). FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. NeuroImage, 12(1), 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0593
- Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965). Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Willkürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und rückmeldende Potentiale. Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 284(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412364
- McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x
- Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
- Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275(5306), 1593-1599. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5306.1593
- Siegel, S. (1975). Evidence from rats that morphine tolerance is a conditioned response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 89(5), 498-506. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077058
- Sterling, P., & Eyer, J. (1988). Allostasis: A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In S. Fisher & J. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health (pp. 629-649). John Wiley & Sons.
- Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensori-motor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203(4943), 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1038/203380a0