Anthropoid: Evolution and Biology of Higher Primates

The study of primates has profoundly shaped our modern understanding of human origins, biological complexity, and cognitive evolution. Among the diverse radiations of the order Primates, the anthropoids constitute the clade that includes New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, apes, and human beings. Characterized by profound neuroanatomical, morphological, and behavioral innovations, anthropoids provide an indispensable window into the evolutionary processes that generated advanced cognition, complex sociality, and manual dexterity.

Anthropoid

1. Concise Definition

An anthropoid (taxonomically designated as infraorder Simiiformes) is any member of the major primate clade comprising platyrrhines (New World monkeys) and catarrhines (Old World monkeys, non-human apes, and humans). Morphologically, anthropoids are distinguished from other primates by traits such as complete postorbital closure of the eye sockets, a fused mandibular symphysis and frontal suture, a relatively enlarged brain-to-body mass ratio, and sophisticated diurnal visual adaptations. Informally, the adjective "anthropoid" also describes any anatomical structure, organism, or conceptual entity that possesses human-like physical characteristics or proportions.

In comparative primatology, evolutionary biology, and biological anthropology, the anthropoid radiation represents a monophyletic lineage that emerged during the Eocene epoch. This lineage departed significantly from ancestral prosimian grades by adopting an exclusively diurnal niche, developing trichromatic or polymorphic color vision, and establishing prolonged life histories marked by extensive parental investment and multifaceted social structures.

2. Etymology & Linguistic Origin

The term anthropoid is derived from the Ancient Greek substantive ánthrōpos (ἄνθρωπος), signifying "human being" or "man," combined with the adjectival suffix -oeidēs (-οειδής), rooted in eîdos (εἶδος), meaning "form," "shape," or "resemblance." Literally translated, the word denotes "human-like in form."

The word entered modern Western biological nomenclature during the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. French naturalist and comparative anatomist Henri-Marie Ducrotay de Blainville utilized related terminology to distinguish human-like quadrumanous mammals. In the mid-nineteenth century, English comparative anatomist Thomas Henry Huxley popularized "anthropoid" in works such as Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature (1863), specifically referencing the anthropoid apes (gibbons, orangutans, chimpanzees, and gorillas) to illustrate mankind's morphological proximity to non-human primates. Concurrently, systematic zoologists adopted the taxonomic designation Anthropoidea (later modified under modern cladistics to Simiiformes) to encompass all simian primates.

3. Pronunciation & Grammatical Form

Pronunciation: In standard International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) notation, the word is pronounced as /ˈæn.θrə.pɔɪd/ in British English and American English.

Grammatical Class:

• Noun (countable): Refers to an individual organism belonging to the infraorder Simiiformes (e.g., "The Miocene fossil was classified as an early stem anthropoid"). Plural: anthropoids.
• Adjective: Pertaining to, resembling, or characteristic of humans or the higher primates (e.g., "The discovered cranial fragment revealed distinctly anthropoid dentition").
• Derived Forms: Anthropoidea (noun, formal taxonomic suborder/infraorder); anthropoidal (adjective, variant of anthropoid); anthropoidism (noun, the state or condition of possessing anthropoid attributes).

4. Detailed Conceptual Explanation

The conceptual boundary of the term "anthropoid" depends on whether it is used in a strict phylogenetic context or an anatomical-descriptive context. Within modern evolutionary taxonomy, an anthropoid is any organism nested within the crown group Simiiformes, descending from the most recent common ancestor of platyrrhines (cebids, atelids, pitheciids, and callitrichids) and catarrhines (cercopithecoids and hominoids). Anthropoids are distinguished from strepsirrhine primates (lemurs, lorises, and galagos) and the haplorhine tarsiers by a suite of derived anatomical specializations, often referred to as the "anthropoid adaptive suite."

Central to this suite is visual specialization. Unlike ancestral strepsirrhines, which rely extensively on nocturnal adaptations and olfactory cues mediated by a moist rhinarium, anthropoids possess a dry nose (haplorhiny), reduced olfactory turbinates, and a profoundly reorganized visual apparatus. Anthropoids developed complete postorbital plates that physically separate the orbit from the temporal fossa, insulating the eyeball from masticatory muscle deformation. This morphological change accompanied the development of a retinal fovea centralis—an area of concentrated cone photoreceptors granting exceptional visual acuity, which facilitated diurnal foraging, fruit and young leaf selection, and the processing of subtle facial expressions.

Craniofacially and dentally, anthropoids exhibit structural reinforcement. The left and right halves of both the mandible (the mandibular symphysis) and the frontal bone fuse early in ontogeny, accommodating higher mechanical stresses generated by rhythmic chewing and dietary shifts toward tough vegetation, hard nuts, and diverse seeds. Dentally, anthropoids exhibit continuous tooth rows with spatulate incisors, shearing canines, and bunodont or lophodont molars, accompanied by an enclosed inner ear where the ectotympanic bone forms a ring or extended auditory tube fused directly to the petrosal bulla.

Beyond anatomy, the concept of the anthropoid incorporates profound neurological, developmental, and behavioral adaptations. Anthropoids possess significantly enlarged neocortices relative to total body mass compared to other mammals. This extensive encephalization supports extended gestation periods, delayed sexual maturation, and protracted lifespans, creating an ecological strategy centered on learning, culturally transmitted behaviors, and intricate social networks governed by dominance hierarchies, reciprocal alliances, and multifaceted vocalizations.

5. Historical Development

The evolutionary and conceptual history of anthropoids has undergone extensive revision over the past two centuries, evolving from classical scala naturae classifications to cladistic paleontology.

• Classical and Pre-Darwinian Classifications (18th to mid-19th Century): Early taxonomists such as Carl Linnaeus grouped humans alongside monkeys and bats in the order Primates in 1758. Georges Cuvier separated humans into the order Bimana ("two-handed") and monkeys and apes into Quadrumana ("four-handed"). The concept of "anthropoid" was originally used to describe species exhibiting uncanny resemblances to humans, serving as a descriptive bridge between nature and mankind.
• The Huxleyan Revolution (1863): Thomas Henry Huxley published Evidence as to Man's Place in Nature, demonstrating that the anatomical differences separating humans from the African great apes (gorillas and chimpanzees) were less pronounced than those separating great apes from lower primates (monkeys and lemurs). This work formalized the anthropoid concept as an evolutionary lineage rather than a philosophical curiosity.
• Fossil Discoveries in the Fayum Depression (Early to Mid-20th Century): Systematic excavations led by Richard Markgraf, Elwyn Simons, and later Duke University teams in the Jebel Qatrani Formation of Egypt's Fayum Depression unearthed early Oligocene stem anthropoids, notably Aegyptopithecus zeuxis, Propliopithecus, and Parapithecus. These discoveries proved that the initial radiation of anthropoids occurred within Afro-Arabia between 34 and 30 million years ago.
• The Asian Origin Hypothesis (Late 20th to Early 21st Century): The discovery of minuscule, highly derived middle-Eocene fossils such as Eosimias in China and Afrasia in Myanmar challenged the traditional Afro-centric model. Paleontologists Christopher Beard, Jean-Jacques Jaeger, and Laurent Marivaux demonstrated that basal stem anthropoids likely originated in Asia during the early-to-middle Eocene (around 45 million years ago) before migrating to Africa, where they underwent extensive adaptive radiation.
• Cladistic Realignment (Late 20th Century): The traditional division of the order Primates into "Prosimii" (lemurs, lorises, tarsiers) and "Anthropoidea" was restructured. Phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that tarsiers share a more recent common ancestor with anthropoids than with lemuriforms. Consequently, tarsiers and anthropoids were unified under the suborder Haplorhini, and Anthropoidea was formally organized as the infraorder Simiiformes.

6. Theoretical Foundations

Several complementary evolutionary hypotheses account for the origin and adaptive radiation of the anthropoids:

The Visual Predation Hypothesis, formulated by Matt Cartmill, originally accounted for primate origins by proposing that stereoscopic vision and grasping extremities evolved to capture nocturnal insects within the fine-branch architecture of forest canopies. However, to explain the distinct transition from basal primates to crown anthropoids, researchers established the Diurnal Foraging and Angiosperm Radiation Hypothesis. As tropical rainforests expanded during the early Cenozoic, flowering plants produced fleshy fruits and young, nutritious foliage. Anthropoid characteristics—such as foveal trichromatic vision, complete postorbital closure to protect the eyes during mastication, and robust jaws—evolved primarily to locate, evaluate, and consume seasonally fluctuating fruit and seed crops in full daylight.

A second pillar is Robin Dunbar's Social Brain Hypothesis. Encephalization within anthropoids significantly outpaces that of most other mammalian lineages. Dunbar argued that the ecological challenges of foraging alone do not fully explain this neurological expansion. Instead, anthropoids live in permanent, complex social groups featuring bonded relationships, coalitional politics, and dynamic dominance hierarchies. Managing these ongoing social calculations, recognizing individual identities, remembering past reciprocal exchanges, and tracking third-party interactions drove the enlargement of the neocortex, establishing a distinct mode of social intelligence characteristic of simians.

Complementing these ideas is the Life History and Extrinsic Mortality Framework. Anthropoids depart from standard r-selection strategies, exhibiting extreme K-selection. Because large brains require substantial metabolic investment, anthropoids evolve slow life histories: prolonged periods of gestation, protracted lactation, late sexual maturity, and exceptional longevity. This evolutionary trajectory relies upon reduced extrinsic mortality, often achieved through social defense mechanisms, arboreal shelter, and advanced behavioral plasticity.

7. Key Components, Types & Dimensions

The anthropoid clade is divided into two primary parvorders, each defined by distinct geographic distributions, dental formulas, and anatomical characteristics:

• Parvorder Platyrrhini (New World Monkeys):
  • Geographic Distribution: Endemic to Central and South America.
  • Nasal Morphology: Broad, flat noses with widely separated, lateral-facing nostrils.
  • Dental Formula: Typically retain three premolars per quadrant, resulting in a dental formula of 2.1.3.3 (or 2.1.3.2 in callitrichids).
  • Anatomical Features: Exclusively arboreal; several large species (e.g., atelines such as spider and howler monkeys) possess prehensile tails equipped with tactile friction pads; lack bony auditory tubes (tympanic ring present inside the bulla); polymorphic color vision is common among females, while males are mostly dichromatic (except in Alouatta).
  • Extant Families: Callitrichidae (marmosets, tamarins), Cebidae (capuchins, squirrel monkeys), Aotidae (night monkeys), Pitheciidae (sakis, uakaris), and Atelidae (howler, spider, and woolly monkeys).
• Parvorder Catarrhini (Old World Monkeys, Apes, and Humans):
  • Geographic Distribution: Indigenous to Africa, Asia, and historically Europe; humans are cosmopolitan.
  • Nasal Morphology: Narrow noses with closely set, downward-pointing nostrils.
  • Dental Formula: Consistently characterized by two premolars per quadrant, yielding the canonical formula of 2.1.2.3.
  • Anatomical Features: Presence of an ossified, tubular external auditory meatus; routinely exhibit uniform routine trichromatic color vision mediated by distinct opsin genes on the X chromosome; tails, when present, are never prehensile; diverse terrestrial and arboreal specializations.
  • Superfamily Cercopithecoidea (Old World Monkeys): Characterized by bilophodont molars, ischial callosities, and cheek pouches (in Cercopithecinae) or specialized multi-chambered sacculated stomachs for folivory (in Colobinae).
  • Superfamily Hominoidea (Apes and Humans): Distinguished by the total loss of an external tail, a broad, dorsally flattened thorax, highly mobile shoulder joints enabling brachiation and suspensory locomotion, expanded brain volume, and simple Y-5 lower molar patterns.
• Stem Anthropoids (Extinct):
  • Basal lineages, including the Eosimiidae (e.g., Eosimias) and the diverse Afro-Arabian families Propliopithecidae and Parapithecidae, displaying transitional character states such as incomplete postorbital walls, variable premolar counts, and primitive tarsal bones.

8. Examples & Illustrative Cases

The functional and evolutionary spectrum of the anthropoids is demonstrated across several representative species:

Case 1: The Cotton-Top Tamarin (Saguinus oedipus) – Platyrrhine Miniaturization:
Tamarins and marmosets of the family Callitrichidae exemplify secondary phyletic dwarfism. They have re-evolved claw-like nails (tegulae) on all digits except the hallux to facilitate vertical clinging on tree trunks, feeding heavily on exudates (tree gums and saps). Despite this ancestral-looking anatomical adaptation, their reproductive systems are derived: they consistently give birth to dizygotic twins, supported by cooperative polyandrous breeding systems where non-maternal group members, especially adult males, carry and provision the young. This case demonstrates that anthropoid traits can be modified secondarily while retaining sophisticated social dynamics.

Case 2: The Olive Baboon (Papio anubis) – Catarrhine Terrestrial Adaptation:
Inhabiting the savannas and open woodlands of sub-Saharan Africa, olive baboons illustrate catarrhine morphological and ecological flexibility. Large-bodied, sexually dimorphic, and primarily terrestrial, they organize into multi-male, multi-female troops numbering upwards of a hundred individuals. Their dentition includes long, interlocking canine teeth honed by lower premolar shearing surfaces (the sectorial P3 complex), functioning as formidable weapons against predators and reproductive competitors. Their social life features intricate alliance formation, kin-based rank inheritance among females, and dynamic dominance struggles among males.

Case 3: The Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) – Advanced Hominoid Cognition:
As members of the family Hominidae, chimpanzees display behavioral complexity that blurs traditional boundaries between animal and human behavior. They exhibit habitual, population-specific tool production (e.g., nut cracking with stone hammers, termite fishing with modified stems), cooperative hunting of smaller mammals, cultural transmission of social practices, and territorial inter-group violence. Their cognitive architecture supports theory-of-mind precursors, intentional communication through deictic gestures, and deep self-awareness demonstrated via mirror self-recognition.

9. Measurement & Assessment

Assessing and classifying anthropoids within biological, evolutionary, and psychological frameworks involves several empirical methodologies:

• Craniometric and Morphometric Analysis: High-resolution Micro-Computed Tomography (Micro-CT) scanning is used to measure cranial vault dimensions, petrosal structure, and internal endocasts. Metrics such as the Orbital Convergence Index (evaluating binocular overlap) and the Postorbital Closure Index quantitatively separate stem anthropoids from archaic strepsirrhines and omomyoids.
• Encephalization Quotient (EQ) and Neural Scaling: Brain size is evaluated in relation to body mass using allometric equations: $$ext{EQ} = rac{ ext{Observed Brain Mass}}{k \cdot ( ext{Body Mass})^{lpha}}$$ Anthropoids typically score substantially higher EQs than prosimians, with catarrhines and hominoids reaching the highest levels among primates. Modern stereological methods also quantify neuronal density within the cerebral cortex.
• Comparative Phylogenomics: Genomic sequencing, targeted exome capture, and molecular clock dating determine divergence times and phylogenetic topologies. Comparative genomic methods examine positive selection on specific loci, such as the FOXP2 gene (associated with motor control and language), ASPM and MCPH1 (regulating cerebral cortical growth), and opsin gene duplications (mediating trichromatic color vision).
• Cognitive and Ethological Paradigms: Primatologists measure cognitive complexity using standardized apparatuses, such as the Primate Cognition Test Battery (PCTB). These tests assess physical domain abilities (space, quantity, causality) and social domain capabilities (social learning, gaze following, intentional communication). Field ethologists employ focal animal sampling and continuous recording methods to calculate sociometric indices, grooming matrices, and coalition rates.

10. Applications & Practical Significance

The academic study and biomedical application of anthropoids extend across multiple disciplines:

Biomedical and Pharmacological Research: Because anthropoids share close genetic homology, immune responses, and neuroanatomy with humans, Old World monkeys (principally Macaca mulatta and Macaca fascicularis) have historically served as model organisms in neurobiology, vaccine development, and immunology. However, ethical considerations have led to increasingly strict international regulatory frameworks (the 3Rs: Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) to minimize or eliminate non-human primate research where possible.

Understanding Human Evolutionary Pathologies: Comparative anthropoid biology helps explain modern human health vulnerabilities. Because humans are bipedal catarrhines, our spine, pelvis, and knee joints reflect mechanical compromises superimposed on an ancestral quadrupedal or suspensory body plan, contributing to lumbar disc herniation and joint osteoarthritis. Similarly, comparative analyses of metabolic traits shed light on human predispositions to metabolic syndrome, obesity, and diabetes, which differ markedly from patterns observed in non-hominoid anthropoids.

Conservation Biology and Ecology: Anthropoids often serve as keystone species and ecosystem engineers in tropical forests. Large-bodied frugivores, such as atelids in the Amazon and hominoids in equatorial Africa, are the primary seed dispersers for canopy trees that sequester substantial forest carbon. Protecting anthropoids directly contributes to preserving complex forest architecture and broader biodiversity.

11. Research & Empirical Evidence

Empirical research across paleontology, molecular genetics, and neurobiology has clarified the timeline and mechanisms of anthropoid evolution:

Paleontological excavations led by Christopher Beard, K. Christopher Beard, and colleagues (1994) described Eosimias sinensis from the middle Eocene of Jiangsu Province, China. The fragmentary jaws and tarsal bones demonstrated an early evolutionary mosaic, combining primitive dental characters with derived anthropoid-like canine anatomy and a foot structure adapted for arboreal quadrupedalism rather than vertical clinging and leaping. This fossil provided crucial morphological evidence that the basal anthropoid branch had diverged by at least 45 million years ago.

In molecular genetics, studies by Surridge, Osorio, and Mundy (2003) revealed the evolutionary dynamics of anthropoid vision. Catarrhines achieved uniform trichromatic vision through an ancient gene duplication of the L/M opsin gene on the X chromosome around 30 to 40 million years ago. Platyrrhines, with the exception of the howler monkey, maintained an allelic polymorphism at a single X-linked opsin locus. This polymorphism produces dichromatic males alongside trichromatic females, documenting a transitional stage in the evolution of sensory systems.

In behavioral ecology, long-term studies directed by Jane Goodall at Gombe, Toshisada Nishida in the Mahale Mountains, and Frans de Waal at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center demonstrated that anthropoid sociality is governed by complex social calculations. De Waal documented post-conflict reconciliation, consolation behaviors, and strategic deceptive acts in chimpanzees and macaques. These observations demonstrated that anthropoid social groups rely on dynamic balance mechanisms rather than unyielding instincts.

12. Cultural & Cross-Cultural Considerations

Human conceptualizations of anthropoids vary across historical and cultural landscapes, reflecting changes in how societies understand their place within nature:

In classical Mediterranean cultures, non-human anthropoids were viewed with alternating fascination and unease. The ancient Egyptians revered the sacred baboon (Papio hamadryas) as an earthly avatar of Thoth, the deity of wisdom, writing, and reckoning, often preserving them as mummies within temple complexes. In contrast, medieval Christian Europe tended to view apes through an allegorical lens, classifying them as grotesque parodies of humanity—symbols of sin, deceit, and fallen spiritual states (simia dei).

In Asian cultural traditions, anthropoids often occupy honored positions. In Hindu cosmology, the deity Hanuman—a central figure in the epic Ramayana—symbolizes loyalty, devotion, and superhuman strength, conferring sacred status on the rhesus macaque and Hanuman langur (Semnopithecus) across India. In Chinese literary traditions, Sun Wukong, the Monkey King from the classical novel Journey to the West, personifies cleverness, rebellious wit, and eventual spiritual enlightenment.

Within modern industrial cultures, anthropoids occupy a distinct ethical and legal space. While historically displayed in menageries or private collections, the demonstrated cognitive complexity and capacity for suffering among higher primates has inspired international legal movements, such as the Great Ape Project. These initiatives advocate for extending basic moral rights—such as freedom from arbitrary imprisonment and bodily harm—to non-human hominoids, challenging traditional legal distinctions between property and persons.

13. Criticisms, Debates & Limitations

Despite robust consensus regarding the monophyly of Simiiformes, several significant controversies remain active in modern primatology and anthropology:

• Geographic Cradle: Africa versus Asia: A major debate centers on whether the earliest stem anthropoids originated in Africa or Asia. Proponents of the Asian hypothesis point to late Paleocene and early-to-middle Eocene taxa like Altiatlasius, Eosimias, and Pondaungia. Opponents argue that many of these fragmentary Asian taxa represent convergent adaptations within non-anthropoid groups (such as adapiforms or tarsiforms). They point to the richer, more continuous fossil sequence found in the Fayum Depression of Egypt as evidence for an indigenous African origin.
• The Transatlantic Rafting Enigma: The appearance of platyrrhines in South America during the late Eocene or early Oligocene (around 36 million years ago, evidenced by fossils such as Perupithecus ucayaliensis) remains a major biogeographic puzzle. Because South America was an isolated island continent separated from Africa by thousands of kilometers of ocean, scientists debate how these small, arboreal primates arrived. The prevailing hypothesis posits sweepstakes dispersal: small populations drifted across the Atlantic on large, tangled mats of vegetation dislodged during severe storms. However, critics argue this scenario presents formidable physiological challenges regarding dehydration, starvation, and minimum viable population sizes.
• Anthropocentric Terminology: Some evolutionary biologists critique the term "anthropoid" itself. Coined to mean "human-like," the word carries historic anthropocentric baggage, implicitly framing human anatomy as the target toward which the entire clade was evolving. Phylogenetic systematists increasingly prefer the cladistic designation Simiiformes to emphasize the lineage's evolutionary history rather than its resemblance to humans.

14. Related Terms & Distinctions

Understanding the precise taxonomic boundaries of the term requires distinguishing it from several closely related concepts:

• Anthropoid vs. Hominoid: All hominoids (superfamily Hominoidea: lesser apes, great apes, and humans) are anthropoids, but not all anthropoids are hominoids. The term anthropoid is broader, encompassing hominoids as well as Old World monkeys (cercopithecoids) and New World monkeys (platyrrhines).
• Anthropoid vs. Hominin: The term hominin refers specifically to modern humans and extinct bipedal human ancestors that emerged following the divergence from the chimpanzee lineage (e.g., Australopithecus, Homo erectus). Anthropoids include hominins alongside hundreds of living and extinct monkey and ape species.
• Anthropoid vs. Prosimian: "Prosimian" is an evolutionary grade that historically encompassed lemurs, lorises, and tarsiers. Prosimians retain primitive mammalian characteristics, including a grooming claw, wet rhinarium (in strepsirrhines), an unfused mandibular symphysis, and reliance on olfaction. In contrast, anthropoids possess dry noses, fused jaws, stereoscopic trichromatic vision, and closed orbits.
• Anthropoid vs. Haplorhine: The suborder Haplorhini includes both the infraorder Simiiformes (the anthropoids) and the infraorder Tarsiiformes (tarsiers). Thus, while all anthropoids are haplorhines, tarsiers are haplorhines that do not belong to the anthropoid clade.
• Anthropoid vs. Anthropomorphic: "Anthropoid" denotes objective biological, taxonomic, and anatomical resemblance or affiliation to humans and higher primates. In contrast, "anthropomorphic" is an interpretative or cognitive term referring to the attribution of human motivations, feelings, or behavioral characteristics to non-human entities, animals, or deities.

15. Summary / Key Takeaways

The term anthropoid designates the monophyletic primate infraorder Simiiformes, comprising New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, non-human apes, and humans. Diverging during the Eocene epoch, anthropoids developed a specialized adaptive suite centered on full diurnality, stereoscopic foveal vision, complete postorbital closure, a fused mandibular symphysis, and significant encephalization. Taxonomically divided into Platyrrhini and Catarrhini, anthropoids established diverse ecological specializations, marked by delayed life histories, complex social organizations, and sophisticated cognitive architectures. Beyond comparative biology, understanding the anthropoid lineage remains central to uncovering the structural, genetic, and evolutionary mechanisms that produced modern humans.

References

• Beard, K. C., Qi, T., Dawson, M. R., Wang, B., & Li, C. (1994). A diverse new primate fauna from middle Eocene fissure-fillings in southeastern China. Nature, 368(6472), 604–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/368604a0
• Cartmill, M. (1974). Rethinking primate origins. Science, 184(4135), 436–443. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.184.4135.436
• de Waal, F. B. M. (2000). Primates—a natural heritage of conflict resolution. Science, 289(5479), 586–590. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5479.586
• Dunbar, R. I. M. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(5), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-01962-4
• Huxley, T. H. (1863). Evidence as to man's place in nature. Williams and Norgate. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.54924
• Surridge, A. K., Osorio, D., & Mundy, N. I. (2003). Evolution and selection of trichromatic vision in primates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(4), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00012-0